Share,

Please, take a look at the video at the start of this thread.  It explains how 
Sri Yukteswar cognized the precession of the Pole Star, which has a cycle of 
about 25,000 years.

He used this cycle as the basis for the cycle of the various yugas.  As such, 
he divided the various yugas at different time intervals.  The Satya Yuga is 
allocated the longest number of years and Kali Yuga with the shortest.

Since the Kali Yuga ended in 1700 AD, we can derive that the vernal equinoxes 
occurred during the sign of Pisces for this yuga.  At this time, our vernal 
equinoxes is occurring at about 7 degrees Pisces.  Based on this sign, we can 
deduce the sign of Satya Yuga to be on the opposite side of Pisces which is the 
sign of Virgo.

Therefore, it will take about 12,500 years (half of the 25,000 year cycle for 
the precession) for the vernal equinoxes to precess from Pisces to Virgo (on a 
counter-clockwise motion).

This is a very fascinating subject.  For more details, you should watch the 
videos by Santos Bonacci (Astro Theology series) on YouTube for a detailed 
explanation of the relationship between the vernal equinoxes and the zodiac 
signs.

I hope this helps.

JR





  

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote:
>
> John I think copper is ruled by Venus. Maybe that's why there are so many 
> Libra ascendents. Meanwhile, Sat Yuga and Virgo?! Which is ruled by Mercury?! 
> That doesn't seem right to me. I think of Guru as the sattvic planet.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
>  From: John <jr_esq@...>
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 4:20 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Yugas of Sri Yukteswar
>  
> 
> 
>   
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u <no_reply@> wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jr_esq@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > He stated that the earth's precession is due to the Sun's orbit with a 
> > > > binary star, Sirius.
> > > > 
> > > > This precession is the basis for the various yugas or ages of human 
> > > > history.  He said that Kali Yuga ended in 1700 AD.
> > > > 
> > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVtJ-yzqT24
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Makes much more sense; C Lutes used to say additionally it forms an 
> > > upward spiral, hence evolution! If you fall behind, you're left behind 
> > > until the next great cycle. He called humanity a parade of sorts some are 
> > > at the front of the parade and some behind, as are the different races. 
> > > Ultimately all come to the same end.
> > > 
> > > I.e. each spiral is a little higher than the last giving an opportunity 
> > > for all souls to have a fertile soil to grow in, the Kali age a little 
> > > higher than the last, etc. but progress the keynote.
> > 
> > 
> > If you only merited a birth in Kali Yuga, chances are you won't be reborn 
> > until the NEXT Kali Yuga, providing you made even a 'little' progress, same 
> > as the other Yugas.
> > 
> > There are millions of souls waiting to reincarnate now but are unable to 
> > due to the low vibrations of this Yuga, they must wait until the next 
> > Dwapara, Treta or Sat Yuga, as may be the case. Only very high souls are 
> > born in the Sat Yuga, but all are given the opportunity to evolve as is the 
> > divine plan.
> > 
> > That's why the 'spiral' goes up and comes down but always advances, but 
> > only incrementally. It never makes a full circle to the place it began, 
> > that would be zero progress.
> >
> 
> Billy,
> 
> According to Sri Yukteswar, Kali Yuga ended in 1700 AD.  So, we are now in 
> the ascending cycle of the Dwapara Yuga or the Copper Age.  By your criteria, 
> the humans being created now are a little better than those in Kali Yuga.  
> The enlightened souls won't incarnate en masse until the vernal equinoxes 
> occur in the sign of Virgo, which pertain to Sat Yuga or the Golden Age.  
> This epoch will start about 12,500 years from now.  Can you wait that long?
> 
> JR
>


Reply via email to