--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <authfriend@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > Nabby, did you not see the update at the end? It wasn't > > > GMO grass after all. > > > > After all ? > > "In fact it was a hybridized version of the product." Perhaps > > even scarier... > > You're joking, right? You do know the difference between > hybridizing and genetic engineering, don't you? > > We've been hybridizing plants for at least 10,000 years > (and of course a lot of it occurs naturally).
Yes: "The process of combining different varieties of organisms to create a hybrid (biology)", But how do you know this hybrid is not between a GMO plant and another natural plant ? > Update: The original report we received stated that the grass was a GMO > > > > version of Tifton 85. In fact it was a hybridized version of the > > > > product. > > > > > > > > > >
