--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > This is all one non sequitur after another, salyavin. > > Argument by assertion doesn't really do the trick, > > you know, just makes you look intellectually dishonest > > like the rest of the New Atheists. Why do you even > > start if you aren't going to follow through? > > Why do you call everyone you disagree with > "intellectually dishonest?" Sooner or later > you always do.
The form of your question is both factually *and* intellectually dishonest. It is factually dishonest to claim that I call everyone I disagree with "intellectually dishonest." In fact, I call "intellectually dishonest" only those who seem to me to be, you know, intellectually dishonest. An intellectually honest way to put your question would be to cite examples of people I have called intellectually dishonest and ask me to show why I made that charge. (Although in most cases you will find that I've already done so before making the accusation. But since you don't read my posts, you wouldn't know that, would you?) > > Show of hands...how many here have been at > one time or another been accused by Judy of > being "intellectually dishonest?" > > See? Almost everyone. :-) >
