--- In [email protected], doctordumbass@... <no_reply@...> wrote: > > Glad you are giving it some thought. I have often noticed when I nail your > ignorance, Barry, that you will no longer post that day. It is really a > striking contrast - If I say nothing, you will blithely post as many times as > you like, but when I call you on your shit, you stop posting, as if scalded.
Barry will also wait until Judy is close to or has posted out for the week then out he comes slapping his posts all over FFL like cheap posters on the side of walls and telephone poles. The internet is a wonderful medium for bullies and cowards - there is so little accountability when you can simply walk away from the computer or never have to look at someone in the face. > > Oh man, and the other thing I really really wished I had mentioned in my last > post, is your pandering to your imagined audience. You will call me Jimbo or > Doc, depending on which way you think the public wind is blowing. This time > its Jimbo - ooooh. Very chickenshit of you, dude. > > --- In [email protected], turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "seventhray27" <steve.sundur@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], doctordumbass@ wrote: > > > > > > > > Please, settle down, Steve. I could not care less about > > > > Robin, or his reputation on here. > > > > > > I've gathered that Jim. But more information about something > > > is better than less information when you are sorting something > > > out. And neither am I gloating about something that appears > > > to "go against" Robin, (and Judy, at this point, as she has > > > positioned herself as Robin's most ardent defender). > > > > > > And nor do I see Barry gloating about it. But since he has > > > been vilified as being such a hater of Robin, (next to Curtis > > > of course, as determined by Judy, who evidently has a scale > > > for such things), why not bring it to the table. > > > > > > In a few hours it will be far in the rear view mirror, unless > > > other parties decide to run with it. > > > > "Run with it?" It's far more likely, given the thing > > that Jimbo has most in common with Robin, that he'll > > react to people criticizing *him* instead of his > > intended victims the way both he and Robin have > > in the past. > > > > "Run away! Run away! Run away!" > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92gP2J0CUjc > > > > :-) > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "seventhray27" steve.sundur@ > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wow! what a reaction. is this an extreme example of shooting the > > > > > messenger? don't even need a show of hands for that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], doctordumbass@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, no street cred for you, little guy. Any student of human > > > nature > > > > > knows that you cannot first shit all over someone, as you have > > > Robin, > > > > > and then trot out some third party excerpt, trying to show your > > > > > objectivity. > > > > > > > > > > > > Who does that?? Only an idiot would operate that way, or someone > > > so > > > > > bent on denigrating someone, that they fail to see their own > > > > > transparency (in other words, an idiot). > > > > > > > > > > > > Personally, I rate your post, "CI", for Completely Impotent. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I pass along here something sent to me by a lurker who preferred > > > to > > > > > have > > > > > > > someone else post it so as not to become a target for the "Robin > > > > > > > supporters." It is an excerpt from a book called "Sacred > > > Schisms: > > > > > How > > > > > > > Religions Divide," edited by James R. Lewis and Sarah M. Lewis. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I cannot confess to having done all my Steinian Due Diligence on > > > the > > > > > > > editors, but a quick glance at their other works seems to > > > indicate > > > > > that > > > > > > > they are scholars with an interest in religions, as opposed to > > > > > someone > > > > > > > with an axe to grind. I pass it along because it seems to be > > > > > something > > > > > > > we don't get much of around here, a view of the whole Robin > > > > > phenomenon > > > > > > > presented without emotion or allegiance to one "side" of the > > > story > > > > > or > > > > > > > another. It seems to present some contradictions to claims here > > > > > about > > > > > > > how much Robin continued to "revere" Maharishi and his teachings > > > > > during > > > > > > > his 15 minutes of fame. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Amazon link to their book is the first link below, and a > > > Google > > > > > > > Reader "Look Inside This Book" is provided at the second (and > > > third) > > > > > > > links. Google Reader does not seem to allow cut-and-paste, so I > > > > > cannot > > > > > > > duplicate it here. The link pointed for me to page 292, but the > > > > > > > information about Robin and his relationship with Maharishi > > > starts > > > > > at > > > > > > > the bottom of page 289. It is missing page 294 for some reason. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.amazon.com/Sacred-Schisms-How-Religions-Divide/dp/0521881471 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://books.google.com/books?id=2ama0nYRlB8C&pg=PA292&lpg=PA292&dq=%22R\ > > > \ > > > > > \ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > obin+Carlsen%22&source=bl&ots=T2I4atqqNl&sig=eRRuklROm7gPtmTdS7FEHPvCU8M\ > > > \ > > > > > \ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > &hl=en&sa=X&ei=GODTUc2-B9P20gXaioDIAw&ved=0CGUQ6AEwCDge#v=onepage&q=%22R\ > > > \ > > > > > \ > > > > > > > obin%20Carlsen%22&f=false > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Robin+Carlsen%22&source=bl&ots=T2I4atqqNl&sig=eRRuklROm7gPtmTdS7FEHPvCU8\ > > > \ > > > > > \ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > M&hl=en&sa=X&ei=GODTUc2-B9P20gXaioDIAw&ved=0CGUQ6AEwCDge#v=onepage&q=%22\ > > > \ > > > > > \ > > > > > > > Robin%20Carlsen%22&f=false> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://tinyurl.com/nwpvnuc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
