Ha ha! That's beautiful Sal - and argument from ignorance perfectly describes 
Richard and Nabby's mentality. 




________________________________
 From: salyavin808 <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2013 3:00 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Chariots of the Gods of the Gaps?
 


  


How Beliefs in Extraterrestrials and Intelligent Design Are Similar
Arguments of divine intervention—alien or otherwise—start with ignorance
By Michael Shermer

 








 

1
inShare 

 


Share on Tumblr


Image: Izhar Cohen
According to the popular series Ancient Aliens, on H2 (a spinoff of the History 
channel), extraterrestrial intelligences visited Earth in the distant past, as 
evidenced by numerous archaeological artifacts whose scientific explanations 
prove unsatisfactory for alien enthusiasts. The series is the latest in a genre 
launched in 1968 by Erich von Däniken, whose book Chariots of the Gods? became 
an international best seller. It spawned several sequels, including Gods from 
Outer Space, The Gods Were Astronauts and, just in time for the December 21, 
2012, doomsday palooza, Twilight of the Gods: The Mayan Calendar and the Return 
of the Extraterrestrials (the ones who failed to materialize).
Ancient aliens theory is grounded in a logical fallacy called argumentum ad 
ignorantiam, or "argument from ignorance." The illogical reasoning goes like 
this: if there is no satisfactory terrestrial explanation for, say, the Nazca 
lines of Peru, the Easter Island statues or the Egyptian pyramids, then the 
theory that they were built by aliens from outer space must be true.
Whereas the talking heads of Ancient Aliens conjecture that ETs used "acoustic 
stone levitation" to build the pyramids, for example, archaeologists have 
discovered images demonstrating how tens of thousands of Egyptian workers 
employed wood sleds to move the stones along roads from the quarry to the site 
and then hauled them up gently sloping dirt ramps of an ever growing pyramid. 
Copper drills, chisels, saws and awls have been found in the rubble around the 
Great Pyramid of Giza, and the quarries are filled with half-finished blocks 
and broken tools that show how the Egyptians worked the stone. Conspicuously 
absent from the archaeological record are any artifacts more advanced than 
those known to be used in the third millennium B.C.
Another alleged aliens artifact is a symbol found in the Egyptian Dendera 
Temple complex that vaguely resembles a modern lightbulb, with a squiggly 
filament inside and a plug at the bottom. Instead of featuring archaeologists 
who would explain that the symbol depicts a creation myth of the time (the 
"plug" is a lotus flower that represents life arising from the primordial 
waters, and the "filament" signifies a snake), ancient aliens fantasists 
speculate that the Egyptians were given the power of electricity by the gods. 
In this "if this were true, what else would be true?" line of inquiry, it is 
telling that no electrical wires, glass bulbs, metal filaments or electric 
power stations have ever been excavated.
On the lid of the sarcophagus of the Mayan king Pakal in Mexico is a 
"rocketlike" image that Ancient Aliens consulting producer Giorgio Tsoukalos 
claims depicts the ruler in a spaceship: "He is at an angle like modern-day 
astronauts upon liftoff. He is manipulating some controls. He has some type of 
breathing apparatus or some type of a telescope in front of his face. His feet 
are on some type of a pedal. And you have something that looks like an 
exhaust—with flames." According to Mayan archaeologists, however, this 
depiction shows King Pakal sitting atop the sun monster and descending into the 
underworld (where the sun goes at night) within a "world tree"—a classic 
mythological symbol, with branches stretched into the heavens and roots dug 
into the underworld.
Ancient aliens arguments from ignorance resemble intelligent design "God of the 
gaps" arguments: wherever a gap in scientific knowledge exists, there is 
evidence of divine design. In this way, ancient aliens serve as small "g" gods 
of the archaeological gaps, with the same shortcoming as the gods of the 
evolutionary gaps—the holes are already filled or soon will be, and then whence 
goes your theory? In science, for a new theory to be accepted, it is not enough 
to identify only the gaps in the prevailing theory (negative evidence). 
Proponents must provide positive evidence in favor of their new theory. And as 
skeptics like to say, before you say something is out of this world, first make 
sure that it is not in this world.
Tellingly, in subsequent printings of Chariots of the Gods? the question mark 
was quietly dropped, and this disqualifier was added on the copyright page: 
"This is a work of fiction. Names, characters, places, and incidents are either 
the product of the author's imagination or are used fictitiously." Gap closed.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=how-beliefs-extraterrestrials-and-intelligent-design-are-similar

 

Reply via email to