Well dear I'm not neutral and I refuse to plonk this time.
On Jul 9, 2013, at 7:18 PM, obbajeeba <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote: > Ravi, you being a neutral and all, acould you answer this for me, please? > WTF is a PLONK? > > Thank you, Obba Gopi > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@...> > wrote: > > > > Share dear - calm down please, you are getting triggered. > > > > Please look up "argue" in the dictionary as well and see how it compares > > to debate and engaging in conversation. Let me know if you need any help. > > > > Hint: There's an emotional aspect in argue which isn't present in > > debate. So people usually qualify it when used with debate such as > > "heated" debate. > > > > Oh what the fuck here it is > > > > argue - "exchange or express diverging or opposite views, *typically in > > a heated or angry way*" > > > > > > > > On 7/9/13 5:42 PM, Share Long wrote: > > > > > > > > > Ann's turn to PLONK. Simply amazing! > > > > > > > > > from google dictionary > > > > > > > > > de·bate > > > > > > /diˈbāt/ > > > Noun > > > A formal discussion on a particular topic in a public meeting or > > > legislative assembly, in which opposing arguments are put forward. > > > > > > > > > Verb > > > Argue about (a subject), esp. in a formal manner. > > > > > > > > > Synonyms > > > /noun/. discussion - dispute - argument - disputation > > > > > > /verb/. dispute - discuss - argue - deliberate - canvass > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > *From:* Ann <awoelflebater@...> > > > *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 9, 2013 5:03 PM > > > *Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Re: Does the size of one's ego equate to > > > their "need to argue?" > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com>, Share Long <sharelong60@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > turq wrote: have a corollary need to portray anyone who *won't* > > > argue with them as "broken" or "defective" or "bad" in some way. > > > > Judy commented: Nobody has said anything like that for days. > > > > Emily to Xeno about Share: worse than that, not being willing to > > > even engage in conversation or debate or play on what she does, FFL > > > style or anything. > > > > > > > > Share replies: PLONK > > > > > > This is perhaps one of the most unbelievable responses I have ever > > > witnessed at FFL. "engage in conversation", "debate" or "play" arenot > > > arguing Share. My God, simply amazing. > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > From: authfriend <authfriend@> > > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 2:55 PM > > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Does the size of one's ego equate to > > > their "need to argue?" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Â > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com>, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > (snip) > > > > > Yet on this forum (judging from the posts I skip these days but > > > can grok > > > > > the essence of just from their first words in Message View), some > > > people > > > > > not *only* seem to have a constant need to argue, they *also* seem to > > > > > have a corollary need to portray anyone who *won't* argue with them as > > > > > "broken" or "defective" or "bad" in some way. > > > > > > > > No, you're hallucinating again. Nobody has said anything > > > > like that for days. > > > > > > > > But you've said what you say here I don't know how many > > > > times. Dozens. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
