> > Judy, in order of importance: IMO you do not have the moral
> > authority to comment beneficially on the upsets bt me and
> > Robin; you do not have the emotional good health to comment
> > beneficially on them; you do not have the emotional
> > intelligence to comment usefully on them; you do not have
> > the professional training to comment usefully or beneficially
> > on them. IMO this is a matter bt me and Robin so lastly, I
> > don't think it is useful or appropriate for you to comment
> > on these matters bt him and me.
> >
authfriend:
> (cough cough) You'll excuse me, I seem to have swallowed
> my spit.
>
> You are of course free to conduct matters between yourself
> and Robin as you see fit, just as I am free to comment on
> whatever happens on FFL, including your public communications
> with and about Robin, as I see fit.
>
SHUT THE FUCK UP ABOUT SHARE! LoL!
And, stop speaking for Robin. If he had anything to say to
Share or you, he'd probably post it. Go figure.
> I'm not at all sure why you imagine I would be interested in
> your opinions of my "moral authority," etc., given what you
> know of my opinions of you on those same scores.
>
> Do you think anyone will notice that you can't seem to
> muster up any reasoned rebuttal to what I've said?
>
> BTW, indulge my curiosity, if you will. You write:
>
> "Plus when Robin emailed me a few weeks ago, on June 17,
> he said nothing specific about our upset. So I don't
> think it is appropriate for you to comment on these
> matters."
>
> I seem to be missing the connection between his not
> saying anything *specific* about your "upset" (how
> specific? did he say anything *generally* about your
> upset?) and the purported inappropriateness of my
> comments on these matters.
>
> After all, that was three weeks ago, and nobody was
> discussing your "upset" at the time here, so why
> *would* he have mentioned it?
>
> It seems a bit dodgy for you to introduce this as if
> it were evidence in your favor. And I wonder why, as
> well, you failed to bring this up when you were making
> this huge fuss about the possibility that he'd been
> reading FFL.
>
