--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Seraphita" <s3raphita@...> wrote:
> Re "Anyone with a gun who shoots an unarmed man in a public place has
> committed a crime." : not if he is convinced his own life is in danger.
> Like it or not that's what the law says in Florida.
> And even if the law didn't say that I'd shoot someone regardless if I
> thought he was going to assault me unprovoked and I had a gun handy.

That is the crux right there, a very good reason why guns have no business in 
the hands of any member of the public. The threat of a broken jaw, a few 
stitches is not worth taking the life of another for. Level playing fields are 
not created by putting guns in the hands of those scared enough or angry enough 
to use them against others without a gun. Violence happens, people get 
threatened, injured, killed all the time. Add guns into the mix and you 
exponentially increase the bloodletting. No one will ever be able to convince 
me that guns are a right I should exercise or fight for. I didn't want to get 
into this topic but I guess I have now.
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@  wrote:
> >
> > Ah, so he is an *intelligent* racist?? Anyone with a gun who shoots an
> unarmed man in a public place has committed a crime. I personally don't
> get into the whole black and white thing like the racist dude in the
> article. I don't give a damn if one person was green and the other
> polka-dotted. Enjoy your class A delusion.

Reply via email to