--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> WTF are you doing!??! Obsessing over this shit, *at work*?? 
> 
> OR you could
> read a headline, 
> take a piss, 
> get a coffee, 
> say hi to one of those interns, 
> tell your boss how great everything is going, 
> rearrange your cube drawer, 
> clean your fingernails, 
> look out the window, 
> go for a quick stroll, in natural light, 
> close your eyes and rest, 
> make a funny face secretly to yourself. 
> 
> Seriously, get a life.

Doc, we ARE his life.
> 
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > Stuck here waiting for a software build that takes a while, 
> > unable to work until it completes, I thought I'd do five 
> > minutes of Yahoo Searching to illustrate my point lately
> > that Ann, more than any other of Judy's minions, has become
> > pretty much monotopical in her ongoing negativity. Like Judy,
> > she doesn't seem capable of *recognizing* this trend in 
> > herself, but a quick scan of her 35 posts so far this week
> > kinda reveals the trend.
> > 
> > Ann's "on the rag" posts this week that contained slams 
> > against people she doesn't like (there can be some dupli-
> > cation in these totals, in that she often slammed more 
> > than one of her "enemies" in the same post):
> > - ragging on Share: 11111 11 (7)
> > - ragging on Barry: 11111 11111 11111 11111 11 (22)
> > - ragging on Seraphita: 11111 1 (6)
> > - ragging on Susan: 11 (2)
> > - ragging on the author of an article mentioned by Barry: 1
> > 
> > Ann's "content" (meaning "non-slam") posts this week consisted of:
> > - one nice post about Snowmass to Steve
> > - one post congratulating Raunchy for ragging effectively :-)
> > - two posts congratulating Ravi for ragging effectively :-)
> > - one post full of platitudes about the Zimmerman case
> > - one post liking a Walt Whitman poem that was posted 
> > by...uh...someone else
> > 
> > I could undoubtedly come up with similar numbers for Judy's
> > 46 posts this week, but why bother? Neither of these women
> > seems *capable* of recognizing their own behavioral trends,
> > and thus of being able to correct them in any way. 
> > 
> > My point is that I suspect that the two of them spend almost 
> > ALL of their time on Fairfield Life ragging on other people 
> > BECAUSE THEY DON'T HAVE ANYTHING ELSE TO SAY.
> > 
> > I invite either or both of them to dispute this by providing
> > a complete list of posts (*including* the URLs to them) they 
> > have made on FFL during the last month that did NOT -- 
> > anywhere in the post -- contain a putdown, insult, or slam 
> > against one of their regular "enemies." 
> > 
> > I predict no reply. All they can do is *claim* that they
> > post other things. When asked to produce them, they can't.
> >
>


Reply via email to