--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... <no_reply@...> wrote: > > WTF are you doing!??! Obsessing over this shit, *at work*?? > > OR you could > read a headline, > take a piss, > get a coffee, > say hi to one of those interns, > tell your boss how great everything is going, > rearrange your cube drawer, > clean your fingernails, > look out the window, > go for a quick stroll, in natural light, > close your eyes and rest, > make a funny face secretly to yourself. > > Seriously, get a life.
Doc, we ARE his life. > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > Stuck here waiting for a software build that takes a while, > > unable to work until it completes, I thought I'd do five > > minutes of Yahoo Searching to illustrate my point lately > > that Ann, more than any other of Judy's minions, has become > > pretty much monotopical in her ongoing negativity. Like Judy, > > she doesn't seem capable of *recognizing* this trend in > > herself, but a quick scan of her 35 posts so far this week > > kinda reveals the trend. > > > > Ann's "on the rag" posts this week that contained slams > > against people she doesn't like (there can be some dupli- > > cation in these totals, in that she often slammed more > > than one of her "enemies" in the same post): > > - ragging on Share: 11111 11 (7) > > - ragging on Barry: 11111 11111 11111 11111 11 (22) > > - ragging on Seraphita: 11111 1 (6) > > - ragging on Susan: 11 (2) > > - ragging on the author of an article mentioned by Barry: 1 > > > > Ann's "content" (meaning "non-slam") posts this week consisted of: > > - one nice post about Snowmass to Steve > > - one post congratulating Raunchy for ragging effectively :-) > > - two posts congratulating Ravi for ragging effectively :-) > > - one post full of platitudes about the Zimmerman case > > - one post liking a Walt Whitman poem that was posted > > by...uh...someone else > > > > I could undoubtedly come up with similar numbers for Judy's > > 46 posts this week, but why bother? Neither of these women > > seems *capable* of recognizing their own behavioral trends, > > and thus of being able to correct them in any way. > > > > My point is that I suspect that the two of them spend almost > > ALL of their time on Fairfield Life ragging on other people > > BECAUSE THEY DON'T HAVE ANYTHING ELSE TO SAY. > > > > I invite either or both of them to dispute this by providing > > a complete list of posts (*including* the URLs to them) they > > have made on FFL during the last month that did NOT -- > > anywhere in the post -- contain a putdown, insult, or slam > > against one of their regular "enemies." > > > > I predict no reply. All they can do is *claim* that they > > post other things. When asked to produce them, they can't. > > >