--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > on 9/20/05 11:31 AM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > 
> > > If MMY did indeed sexually exploit female students,
> > > the argument can certainly be made that we should
> > > know about it.  But to exaggerate the misbehavior
> > > beyond all reason and use it as a weapon against him
> > > suggests that one is motivated by something other
> > > than just high-minded disapproval of the specific
> > > misbehavior.
> > 
> > I'm not doing that. I still regard him as a great saint (in the 
> > sense of highly developed consciousness). I'm just trying to 
> > understand the whole package as it is, rather than as I once
> > idealized it to be.
> Bingo! (What he said...) The other part of the problem for me is 
> the sexual conduct is dishonst.  That dishonesty can spill over and
> imply dishonesty in other areas of the teaching. 

Assuming that there was sexual contact inthe first place. BTW, what 
part of it would have been "dishonest?"

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page

To subscribe, send a message to:

Or go to: 
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

Reply via email to