Still running the obsession, I see.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <feste37@> wrote:
> >
> > I'd call that a rather desperate rejoinder, long on
> > self-justification and short on insight into what
> > really motivates you.
>
> And I'd call that what I did earlier, having shit
> for brains. :-)
>
> Let's see what happens next week, shall we?
>
> I think you know what it'll be, and despite all your
> big talk about "pettiness," you're FINE with it. When
> her penance on the Ain't Got No Self Control Bench is
> over, the former pro wrestler in question will try to
> wreak her vengeance by finding something -- anything --
> to rag on in my posts. It won't matter what they're
> about, or whether they are positive or negative, or
> whether they even mention anyone here, or anything TM-
> related. She'll find *something* in them to rag on.
> And then her shit-for-brains groupie-minions will pile
> on, finally able to have someone think for them, and
> provide them with a "writing prompt" so that *they*
> have someone to rag on, too.
>
> Will you notice at that time that I will *not* be
> reacting to them, and *not* mentioning any of them
> in my posts? Probably not. You'll stick with the same
> old story you've bought into already.
>
> Then again, you've stuck with one loser story (TM)
> for a lot longer than that, so I guess no one should
> be surprised. :-)
>
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <feste37@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > You're running your obsession again, doing exactly the
> > > > thing you accuse others of: trying to "get" your "enemies"
> > > > and prove them "wrong" so you can "win." You like to
> > > > pretend you are above such pettiness but the record
> > > > shows otherwise.
> > >
> > > Listen, shit-for-brains, that's what Jimbo The Enlightened
> > > Bimbo was doing. Me, I was just making a joke in my original
> > > post, playing off of the nickname that Andrew Skolnick gave
> > > to the Judester, linking it to the name of a wrestler in
> > > someone's post. Jimbo tried to make that into an obsession,
> > > LYING to do so (he even forgot that *HE* had brought up her
> > > name this week, much less that his other Mean Girls had).
> > >
> > > And *since* I pointed out his LIE, the ones "piling on" and
> > > trying to "get" someone (moi) over this are the same Mean
> > > Girls Club as usual, and now *you* are helping them.
> > >
> > > How 'bout if you don't like all the pettiness, you refrain
> > > from adding yours to the mix, eh?
> > >
> > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ <no_reply@>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Do you know you are the ONLY ONE here, out of this
> > > > > > thousand-plus member forum, who has even mentioned
> > > > > > her NAME, since she left last week?? Now, THAT is
> > > > > > dedication!
> > > > >
> > > > > Hmmmm. It appears that the self-proclaimed "enlightened"
> > > > > guy LIES like a rug.
> > > > >
> > > > > Judy's name has been mentioned in 18 posts this week,
> > > > > including 6 by Obba, 3 each by Willytex, Ann, and
> > > > > Seventhray, 1 by merudanda, and now 2 by *him*.
> > > > >
> > > > > And not only is he a LIAR, the "enlightened" guy has
> > > > > now documented himself as probably the only person on
> > > > > the forum who didn't laugh at an obvious joke.
> > > > >
> > > > > Some commercial for "enlightenment," Maharishi-style, eh?
> > > > >
> > > > > :-)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
