David needs to speak for himself. There is not necessarily a "we", in his comment.
Thought is the *only* reason Mr. Frawley, and you, John, are able to share this piece of spinach with us. The engineers that developed this technology of communication, needed to think deeply, and continuously, to put this together. If I may hazard a guess, David F. has just discovered that 90% of his thoughts are useless energy and momentum, spent maintaining a story. It is a common, though by no means, universal malady. Once he sees this, perhaps Dave can put his mind into silence, and simply recognize the Divine utility of thought - the other 10%. In the meantime, his projecting isn't helping. --- In [email protected], "John" <jr_esq@...> wrote: > > "Thought, if we learn to observe it, is a reaction-mechanism devoid of true > consciousness. It is the inertia of our conditioning that we fail to truly > question." > > David Frawley >
