--- In [email protected], Michael Jackson <mjackson74@...> wrote: > > Umm, if you wouldn't mind telling me who or what I did wrong according to you > - I don't recall revealing personal information about anyone.
Careful MJ, you only have a post or so left. Don't post out now on the virtual eve of FFL freedom! (Maybe it was because you said "Robin C"? Hell, if I know what you said!) > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Buck <dhamiltony2k5@...> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 9:48 PM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex's Birthday Present - Posting Limit > > > > Â > > Were I king of FFL I'd make some changes around here. Like did you see MJ > earlier today revealing some personal information about an anonymous FFL > poster here. Were I King, MJ would be out of here on his ear for serious > felony against the guidelines. That guy has fouled and had way more than > three strikes here. I'd clean up the roster real quick. -Buck > > > > > --- In [email protected], "feste37" <feste37@> wrote: > > > > > > I have some seniority too, since post #67, September 28, 2001, is mine > > > (under a different handle). I've been here ever since. > > > > > > > > > > No it should go to a mediator meditator. It is time for: > > !Return of Anti-Blasphemy Law and Order! It's time is nigh. It will be a > > dawn of a New FFL Life, an age of Enlightenment on FFL. In that new day on > > FFL all will be meditators and the wolf and the lamb will live together; > > the leopard will lie down with the baby goat. The calf and the yearling > > will be safe with the lion, and a little child [Buck] will lead them all. > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Alex Stanley" > > > <j_alexander_stanley@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is what we can expect X 10, perhaps even more now with the > > > > > "generous" gift from Rick to Alex. > > > > > > > > > > If Alex doesn't like it, why not let Buck do the moderating ? :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, in terms of people still here who posted early on, Dick Mays has > > > > top seniority at post #5, followed closely by Buck at #6. Buck's been > > > > chomping at the bit to whip this place into accord with Natural Law, so > > > > why not put him in charge of the whole thing? To put it another way, > > > > what would Maharishi do? Maharishi would chose Buck. > > > > > > > > > >
