Article (and book) that I figured you wouldn't want to miss:

http://www.uproxx.com/tv/2013/08/breaking-bad-writers-room-photos/
<http://www.uproxx.com/tv/2013/08/breaking-bad-writers-room-photos/>


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, azgrey <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, azgrey <no_reply@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Spoiler alert!!!! Events of season 5.2 revealed here.
> >
> > No problemo. Thanks for the spoiler notice, but I've
> > seen it twice now. Fellow addict here. Others, BE
> > WARNED.
> >
> > > The way Walt made baby Holly "wave goodbye" to Hank.
> > > The little high pitched sweet voice. Chilling. Made
> > > my skin crawl. Completely innocent of evil.
> >
> > The look on Walt's next-door-neighbor Carol's
> > face as he says, "Hi Carol."
> >
> > Lydia, showing up at the car wash. I can tell
> > already that Lydia is going to be Big Trouble,
> > possibly the reason Walt needs that M-60.
>
> Most definitely.
>
> And I believe this will lead us to a resolution
> of who Gus Fring really was. It is too big of a loose
> end to ignore. --not his real name....the cartel
> wouldn't kill him because of who he was...having Mike
> look into seeing whether his background could be found
> by the DEA... I could go on and on. Why were there
> toys scattered in
> one corner of his immaculately neat home when Walt
> came for dinner? There were much larger forces at play
> behind Gus and Lydia is a link in that chain. BTW, there
> is a great recent interview with the Scottish actress who
> plays Lydia. I would provide a link but I'm too lazy to
> look.
>
> I think it is worth going back and re-watching, one more time,
> the scene in season one where pre-cancer Walt addresses his
> class on chiral compounds. Lefthand and righthand isomers
> inhabiting the same body. Good and evil. Couple this with
> Werner Heisenberg's uncertainty principle which states that
> the exact position and momentum of a particle cannot be
> simultaneously known, and you have the basis of my theory
> that Hank is gonna break bad in an unexpected way. Yeah,
> I know, I've been drinking too much coffee.
>
> I must admit that I do enjoy chatting over coffee with an
> observant fellow addict. I never noticed how Walt picks up the
> qualities of those he has killed until it was explicitly pointed out
> to me. It started with cutting off the crusts of bread of the
> sandwiches he makes for Crazy-Eight. He then adopts the practice
> for himself. It continues on with every person he whacks. When he
> folded the towel to kneel on, as Gus did as he ralphed in the
> toilet,
> like Gus, even though he had never seen Gus do it! I had a kensho
> right then.  Good stuff! It was hidden from me in plain sight.
>
> <Lawson, please ignore the kensho as I know you get very confused
> when facing experiences of no-self due to your conditioning.>
>
>
>
> >
> > > Even though it is chronologically prior to Walt finding
> > > "Leaves of Grass" missing and the GPS on his car along
> > > with the subsequent epiphany regarding Hank, this was
> > > another of a score of "Checkov's guns" that arose in
> > > this episode. "Tread lightly" harkening back to to the
> > > close-up of the motto of the license plate of the car
> > > Walt drove to Denny's in the cold opening scene of
> > > season 5.
> >
> > Good catch. I didn't notice that. I was wondering
> > where that line came from when I watched it the
> > second time.
> >
> > > Barry2 expressed last year that he felt the import
> > > of the inscription written by G.B. that Hank read
> > > inside "Leaves of Grass" would go over the head of
> > > most viewers. I feel otherwise. The type of viewer
> > > attracted to this show learns, or has the natural
> > > ability, to constantly scan for this type of clue
> > > which is inherent in the very DNA of BB. This
> > > particular scene is unique in that it produces in
> > > the viewer a mental equivalent of the use of a
> > > visual intensely quick zoom-lens shot as the viewer
> > > sees the character gain a realization that the
> > > viewer gained long before.
> >
> > A famous story from Alfred Hitchcock:
> >
> > There is a distinct difference between "suspense"
> > and "surprise," and yet many pictures continually
> > confuse the two. I'll explain what I mean.
> >
> > We are now having a very innocent little chat.
> > Let's suppose that there is a bomb underneath this
> > table between us. Nothing happens, and then all of
> > a sudden, "Boom!" There is an explosion. The public
> > is surprised, but prior to this surprise, it has
> > seen an absolutely ordinary scene, of no special
> > consequence. Now, let us take a suspense situation.
> > The bomb is underneath the table and the public
> > knows it, probably because they have seen the
> > anarchist place it there. The public is aware the
> > bomb is going to explode at one o'clock and there
> > is a clock in the decor. The public can see that
> > it is a quarter to one. In these conditions, the
> > same innocuous conversation becomes fascinating
> > because the public is participating in the scene.
> > The audience is longing to warn the characters on
> > the screen: "You shouldn't be talking about such
> > trivial matters. There is a bomb beneath you and
> > it is about to explode!"
> >
> > In the first case we have given the public fifteen
> > seconds of surprise at the moment of the explosion.
> > In the second we have provided them with fifteen
> > minutes of suspense. The conclusion is that whenever
> > possible the public must be informed. Except when
> > the surprise is a twist, that is, when the unexpected
> > ending is, in itself, the highlight of the story.
> >
> > > This is tremendous work by the screen writers as it
> > > instantaneously drives the dramatic tension of
> > > anticipation to a new level while at the same time
> > > equalizes the knowledge/understanding level of viewer
> > > and character. This show is masterful at communicatioing
> > > epiphanies without using dialogue. Sounds. Lighting.
> > > Unique angles and lens. Taking something as cliched as
> > > Walt looking at himself in a broken mirror, eyes blurred,
> > > is done in such a way that it feels fresh in a Breakingly
> > > Bad way.
> > >
> > > Damn! I loves me this show.
> >
> > I understand. Only seven more episodes of this greatness
> > to enjoy, as a first-time experience. What a delight to
> > look forward to...
> >
>
> Like a kid waiting for X-mas in August.
>


Reply via email to