--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > Judy, Of all the stances you've taken, this one condemns you > > as a broken personality. > > > > How could anything about this be good news? > > Well, if you're thinking it's bad news because they should > have strung him up or thrown him in the Hole for life, we > have nothing to discuss. > > On the other hand, if you're thinking he shouldn't have > gotten *any* prison time, we are in perfect agreement. > Given that he was going to get prison time no matter what, > though--that being the "circumstances" I referred to--I'm > very glad he got the lighter sentence.
I think he misunderstood what you were saying but this post of yours has made it crystal clear. > > > > > BAH! > > > > Edg > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > The prosecution had asked for *60 years*. He'll have 3 years > > > knocked off the 35 for time in custody and for mistreatment > > > he received during his pretrial confinement. > > > > > > He'll be eligible for parole in a little over 8 years. > > > > > > Everything I've been reading suggested he'd be in prison for > > > the rest of his life, so this seems to me to be very good news > > > under the circumstances. >