--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@...> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > Judy, Of all the stances you've taken, this one condemns you
> > as a broken personality.  
> > 
> > How could anything about this be good news?
> 
> Well, if you're thinking it's bad news because they should
> have strung him up or thrown him in the Hole for life, we
> have nothing to discuss.
> 
> On the other hand, if you're thinking he shouldn't have
> gotten *any* prison time, we are in perfect agreement.
> Given that he was going to get prison time no matter what,
> though--that being the "circumstances" I referred to--I'm
> very glad he got the lighter sentence.

I think he misunderstood what you were saying but this post of yours has made 
it crystal clear.
> 
> 
> 
> > BAH!
> > 
> > Edg
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote:
> > >
> > > The prosecution had asked for *60 years*. He'll have 3 years
> > > knocked off the 35 for time in custody and for mistreatment
> > > he received during his pretrial confinement.
> > > 
> > > He'll be eligible for parole in a little over 8 years.
> > > 
> > > Everything I've been reading suggested he'd be in prison for
> > > the rest of his life, so this seems to me to be very good news
> > > under the circumstances.
>


Reply via email to