You can take that up with Krishna. PS The Gita has a lot of Chapters, doesn't it? - 18 or something. Yeah, the space between CC and UC is almost insignificant, given that both are ego trips.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote: > > Doc, if Arjuna had been in UC at the beginning of the Gita, then Krishna > would not have needed to tell him to be without the three gunas! > > > > ________________________________ > From: "doctordumbass@..." <doctordumbass@...> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 10:29 PM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: How the deluded see the world.... > > > > Â > Robin could have been in Unity consciousness, where similarity predominates, > over differences. But that SOC is still relative to one's singular identity. > The identity must shift to a less localized state to grow beyond the Unity > SOC. The core fear of duality is still present in the Unity SOC, although the > perception that this duality is an illusion begins to take hold, due to the > incontrovertible oneness that the heart and intellect begin to sense, > outwardly. > > Unity isn't the end of the road, simply the furthest Maharishi could go with > a symptomatic description. Unity is not the same thing as Yoga, or Union, > comprehensively. Unity SOC is the state of Arjuna's mind before Krishna's > discourse takes him beyond That. > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" <emptybill@> wrote: > > > > > > Yep, went back and read posts 312097 and 299555. > > > > > > I pointed out to the "Muni of Monte Cassino" (a number of times) > > > that none of the descriptions of his purported "Unity Consciousness" > > > conform to Shankara's explanations - whether in the BrahmaSutraBhasya, > > > UpanishadBhasya or BhagavadGitaBhasya. > > > > > > Such "grand enlightenment" appears to have been Robin's own > > > neo-Advaitic epiphanies later aggrandized and grafted upon Maharishi's > > > explanations. > > > > Nuh-uh. Maharishi's teaching was where he first encountered > > explanations of enlightenment. > > > > > Maharishi's descriptions themselves are a form of > > > neo-yogic advaita and Robin was unwilling to tacitly match his own > > > purported "enlightenment" with the explanations of traditional > > > advaita. > > > > Right. He was a disciple of Maharishi. > > > > > He wouldn't even continue a conversation bringing it up for > > > consideration. > > > > > > This unwillingness was, for me, a clue to Robin's delusive > > > self-absorption . > > > > Actually it was completely irrelevant. Think about it for > > a minute. What good would it have done him at this point to > > consider matching his experience with that of other > > descriptions? What good would it have done him back then, > > for that matter? > > > > You've really never made any sense on this topic, empty. > > >
