Share, don't mind if I do. If we at the Funny Farm Lounge, and its occupants got together, we would find we were all like in some way and we will be asking each other for example; "Turq, do you have any brother's or sisters? Cousins?"
In conclusion to this, the party at Ann's will be simply platonic! Come and join the fun! If this reads, BORING!..when we go back to our rooms for the evening, alone, we can hook up to Ann's WIFI and write and share things via email as to what we imagined the wonderful person is via the Funny Farm Lounge. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote: > > Thanks, Jason, makes me wonder what would happen if we could smell the Funny > Farm Lounge and its occupants (-: > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Jason <jedi_spock@...> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2013 7:28 AM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: A Real Fairfield Life Post > > > > Â > > > --- Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote: > > > > Jason, it's this kind of insightful input that makes me glad you've > > returned to the forum. I also appreciated your post about the 6 kinds of > > immune system and complementary immune systems being the basis of sexual > > attraction. I had not previously heard about either aspect of the immune > > system though I was familiar with the idea of facial symmetry. > > > > > > I googled on 6 types of immune systems and didn't find anything definitive. > > Are the 6 types of systems based on the types of immune cells? > > > > Share, I heard this a number of times on the discovery > channel. I think you should be able to find if by googling > "discovery" along "immune systems" and "attraction". > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_odor_and_subconscious_human_sexual_attraction > > https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/01/6/l_016_08.html > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Jason <jedi_spock@> > > > > > > > > turquoiseb: > > > > > > > > To rudely follow up on my own post, but cutting to > > > > the chase... > > > > > > > > > > --- "richardatrwilliamsdotus" <punditster@> wrote: > > > > > > If you had free will, you could levitate or leap over > > > tall buildings; you would have mind control and be > > > able to predict the future, so you could avoid the > > > dangers that lie ahead. Go figure. > > > > > > Free will would be like being a God - able to cause > > > change at will. > > > > > > Sorry Charlie, but the world doesn't work that way. > > > > > > We all follow the laws of cause and effect - a body > > > in motion tends to stay in motion, etc. > > > > > > That is, unless you're attempting to inject a new, > > > transcendental force into the universe. > > > > > > Just remember: a body at rest tends to stay at rest. > > > > > > LoL! > > > > > > If we had free will we could see into the future, or > > > go back in the past and change things. If we had > > > free will we could ignore social morals and not even > > > consider a moral reciprocity. We could forget about > > > responsibility. We could do what we want, when we > > > want, and that would be the whole of the law. > > > > > > Maybe so. > > > > > > But, if you had free will you could go back into the > > > past and cause change at will. If you had free will > > > you could have seen into the future and read my post > > > before I sent it, and willed me to post something > > > different. But, the past is the past, and you cannot > > > go back and change nary a line. A body in motion tends > > > to stay in motion. That is, unless I willed you to > > > respond to my post. Go figure. > > > > > > > > From: Jason <jedi_spock@> > > > > The analogy given in indian, hindu philosophy is that of a > > Cow tied to a stake, with a long rope in a grass field. > > > > Within the space of the radius of the rope, the cow has the > > freedom to graze here or there. However, the cow cannot go > > beyond the radius of the rope. The rope represents karma. > > > > Basicaly there are two types of karma, 'prabadha karma' > > which cannot be changed and 'sachita karma' which can be > > changed as your have the freedom to take decisions. > > > > The unchangable aspect of karma is fate or distiny. This is > > what people generaly refer to a karma. There is no free > > will here. > > > > The changable aspect of karma can be altered with some free > > will is given only to entities with intellect. On earth > > humans are the only entities with intellect, thus we have > > some limited free will. > > > > The reason is, only entites with intellect have choices. > > Lower order animals have no choices, their behaviour is > > bound by instincts. Thus your free will is limited to the > > amount of choices you have. > > > > > turquoiseb: > > > > > > > > IF you believe > > > > that Nature runs things > > > > and you don't really > > > > have any Free Will > > > > with which to "decide" > > > > what to do > > > > > > > > DID you ever > > > > have a choice about > > > > whether to meditate > > > > or not? > > > > > > > > :-) > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Very nice post. THIS is what Fairfield Life could be if so many > > > > > weren't so committed to lowering it to their level. > > > > > > > > > > That said, I only have one comment, and I hope you understand > > > > > that this is for fun, since we've discussed our differences of opinion > > > > > on the subject of free will in the past... > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > So, being able to enlighten someone or teach them about it is a > > > > > > pretty big gift, and so I do respect MMY - warts and all. > > > > > > > > > > IF, as you suggest, there is no free will, and we're just flowing > > > > along > > > > > with Nature, circling the drain of ITS intention, not ours, why would > > > > > an ostensible teacher of enlightenment be any more special than any > > > > > other being, or what they "teach" a "gift?" > > > > > > > > > > I mean, if there is no free will, and we're all just doing what Nature > > > > > intends, then how could anything such a "teacher of enlightenment" > > > > > do or say *affect* us in any way? According to the No Free Will > > > > > theory, someone or something ELSE is running things. Nothing that > > > > > *anyone* we ever meet should be able to change that Plan, or Flow, > > > > > or whatever you choose to call it. > > > > > > > > > > Enlightened, schmightened. If there is No Free Will, and no one has > > > > > the ABILITY to change what is going to happen to them (because > > > > > Nature is "running" all of that shit), then how can any "teaching" by > > > > > any supposed "teacher of enlightenment" be seen as having been > > > > > instrumental in any of his/her students realizing enlightenment? > > > > > > > > > > Nature handles that shit, according to your theory. Not the seeker, > > > > > and not the teacher. IF your theory is correct, and there is No Free > > > > > Will, there is simply no possibile way to affect one's own future. It > > > > > wouldn't matter how many "teachers of enlightenment" you met; > > > > > Nature controls whether you're going to realize your own enlight- > > > > > enment...not the teachers, and not you. > > > > > > > > > > :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
