On 8/31/2013 12:45 PM, lengli...@cox.net wrote:
How do you judge enlightenment by behavior?
He's a newbie and hasn't been here very long, so he doesn't
realize that most of the arguments against practicing TM
have already been refuted numerous times, especially
this one - that enlightenment can be defined by a person's
behavior.
Apparently he hasn't read all the messages on the board
yet - he seems kind of slow on the uptake. Go figure.
L
--- In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, <mjackson74@...> wrote:
I find it as credible as all the other "proven" research on TM
I do find it interesting that those who were closest to M over the
years and did his bidding without too much questioning like Big Bopper
Bevan and Neil Patterson are generally the biggest showcases of what
enlightenment is not like.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* "LEnglish5@..." <LEnglish5@...>
wel,, as to the part about provable enlightenment, perhaps you missed
the memo, but research on people reporting 24/7 pure consciousness
during waking, dreaming and sleeping for at least a year, was
published several years ago.
--- In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, <mjackson74@...> wrote:
I have every confidence that it WILL in fact happen with the same
alacrity and timeliness that one person per second slipped into CC
(something Marshy predicted back during the sidhi prep courses), the
building of the phallic Victory Towers, the establishment of a 10,000
pundit/yogic flyer course using the many millions of dollars he asked
the world to give him that purpose, and of course in the same timely
fashion that we have establish proveable enlightenment and world peace.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* "LEnglish5@..." <LEnglish5@...>
*
*
It will be very interesting if this acually happens (24 minutes
into video)
http://www.maharishichannel.in/archives/2012_video_files/01_2012/2012_play.php
