My apologies Share.
________________________________ From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2013 8:29 AM Subject: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Post Count burpola Emily, I stopped counting during the first week of unlimited posting when I think I got up to 175! No way I was gonna keep track of that! Anyway, 70 per week and 10 per day are simply guidelines for myself. As for impulse control, for me it's more impulse postponement. Some posts I tuck away out of the inbox and if I'm still *inspired* to reply later, then I do. --- In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote: Yes, I know that's what you said. Pretty good this week, no? I thought you were counting in terms of 10/day and counting them yourself! My bad. How many do you think you'd be posting if you moved on every impulse you had to post? Maybe you should count impulses and then calculate what percentage 70 is (smile). I'm just teasing you Share....my history with regard to impulse control is poor too. >--- In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Because, Emily, I have a goal to post 70 or less posts per week and I want to >see if I'm getting closer to that goal. > > > > > > >________________________________ > From: Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@...> >To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 11:28 AM >Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Post Count burpola > > > > >Why do you care? > > > >________________________________ > From: Share Long <sharelong60@...> >To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 1:20 PM >Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Post Count burpola > > > > >nope newsguru, either the pundisters or punditsters or pun disasters are >supposed to prevent...something! Anyway, thanks for all the lists which are >driving me bananas because on one of them I appear thrice, on another twice, >and on a third, only once. I daren't go and figure! > > > > > > >________________________________ > From: Bhairitu <noozguru@...> >To: [email protected] >Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 2:30 PM >Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Post Count burpola > > > > >But aren't the pundits supposed to prevent that? > >On 09/13/2013 12:00 PM, j_alexander_stanley@... wrote: > > >> Well, you know how it goes... the lagna's nakshatra goes all combust on the >>smriti, and yada yada yada, the internet goes down. >> >> >>--- In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>You mean that fantabulous 1000 gbps Fairfield Internet isn't working? Must >>not be enough gerbils at the dome! >> >>Well here's this morning's count: >> >>Start Date (UTC): 2013-09-07 00:00:00 >>End Date (UTC): 2013-09-14 00:00:00 >>265 messages as of (UTC) 09/13/13 09:05 >> >> 50 Share Long >> 38 turquoiseb >> 27 obbajeeba >> 25 Bhairitu >> 21 punditster >> 20 Michael Jackson >> 17 richardatrwilliamsdotus >> 12 emptybill >> 11 Ann Woelfle Bater >> 10 sharelong60 >> 7 Jason >> 5 Mike Dixon >> 5 FFL PostCount >> 3 Rick Archer >> 3 Emily Reyn >> 3 Arhata Osho >> 2 WLeed3 >> 2 Dick Mays >> 1 wleed3 >> 1 at_man_and_brahman >> 1 Steve Sundur >> 1 Kevin >> >>Posters: 22 >> >>On 09/12/2013 03:06 PM, j_alexander_stanley@... wrote: >> >> >>>Internet access is down at the house. >>> >>> >> > > > > > > >
