On 9/19/2013 6:30 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> Or is it the "main MO" for people, especially on the internet, to lie?
>
So, we are agreed - that's what I was sayin' years ago when this
first came up! Everyone lies, all the time. In normal conversation
individuals have been shown to tell lies about one per minute.
The truth can't be put into words.
> Figure it out and get back to me.
>
So for years, I figured Judy was just lying when she said somebody
was lying, since everyone lies all the time. And then Turq pipes up
claiming that there's no 'truth', so I figure there's no lie, no truth,
and that Judy just doesn't like me or Share. Go figure.
--- In [email protected], <[email protected]>
wrote:
That was just a quick cursory search of Yahoo FFL.
If I made a longer search on Usenet I could probably find
hundreds of instances since 1995 where you claimed
so-and-so was lying. You know this is true, Judy - why
deny it? I'm not the first person to conclude that this
is your main MO.
Or is it the "main MO" for people, especially on the internet, to lie?
Figure it out and get back to me.
On 9/19/2013 12:29 PM, authfriend@... <mailto:authfriend@...> wrote:
Says Richard, proving that he's a liar (again).
--- In [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
Maybe it's time to review the number of liars posting to FFL.
According to Judy, the top posters who posted lies are Buck,
Barry, Curtis, Vaj, Richard, Steve, and Share.
And the minor bottom posters are Sal, salyavin, azgrey,
navashok, PaliGap, Nabby, irentea, and Xeno.
So, we got fifteen liars posting to the discussion group.
Did I miss anyone?
So if true, then it looks like fifteen of the FFL respondents
posted lies in one year and they should apologize to the
group.
If untrue, then Judy is a liar and posted at least fifteen lies,
or more, to the discussion.
If we take a vote, probably at least fifteen respondents would
vote to censure Judy.
Now that's funny!!!
On 9/19/2013 11:18 AM, authfriend@... <mailto:authfriend@...> wrote:
> It's not a matter of opinion, I'm afraid, that Richard is a
liar and a troll.
>
As to your pandering, we could also call it brown-nosing, sucking up
to, or fawning over.
--- In [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
Judy, I don't agree with you that Richard is a liar or troll or that
I pander.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* "authfriend@..." <mailto:authfriend@...> <authfriend@...>
<mailto:authfriend@...>
*To:* [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Thursday, September 19, 2013 10:58 AM
*Subject:* RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Buck Lied, was I stand with U
Buck
Actually he's a liar and a troll, whichever of his many handles he's
using. But you go right ahead and pander to him anyway. Beggars
can't be choosers.
--- In [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
Willytex, IMHO you are a brave and good soul. PS could it all be
about having lots of handles? (-:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Richard J. Williams <punditster@...> <mailto:punditster@...>
*To:* Richard J. Williams <[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Wednesday, September 18, 2013 6:36 PM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Buck Lied, was I stand with U
Buck
So, it's all about Richard. Go figure:
I, Willytex, am truly sorry for ever lying to the discussion group.
I, Willytex, apologize to MJ for calling him an idiot.
On 9/18/2013 10:17 AM, awoelflebater@...
<mailto:awoelflebater@...> wrote:
Dear Richard, if you apologize to MJ then I am sure Judy
might consider apologizing to Buck. When Barry apologizes to
everybody then Judy might consider apologizing to Share.
When Share apologizes to Robin then Judy might consider
apologizing to Steve. An apology to Barry, however, might
extract a higher price.
--- In [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
Judy called five people liars - it's a pattern. Judy should be
taken to task for this offense - Barry, Steve, Richard, Buck
and Share should insist on a retraction and an apology.
So, we can see that half of the regular respondents on this
list have been smeared by Judy for no good reason. It's
time to put a stop to the MGs.
Stand up for your rights!
Dear Richard, if you apologize to MJ then I am sure Judy might
consider apologizing to Buck. When Barry apologizes to
everybody then Judy might consider apologizing to Share. When
Share apologizes to Robin then Judy might consider apologizing
to Steve. An apology to Barry, however, might extract a higher
price.
On 9/17/2013 2:27 PM, sharelong60@...
<mailto:sharelong60@...> wrote:
> Judy, you began by calling Buck a liar and saying he
lied. Then that
morphed into wrong and bliss ninny. That's what I mean by
backpedaling
and that's why I thought you had changed your mind.
.
