No, that is plenty good.  But, when money and assets are involved, I'd be 
inclined to think the Shank's input would be sort of useless.
 
  

________________________________
 From: Share Long <sharelon...@yahoo.com>
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> 
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2013 6:48 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Boy, did Maharishi get that one right!
  
   
 
Steve, Buck reported that Dr. Nader suggested that the situation with 
Maharishi's will be taken to the Shankaracharya. And he upheld Maharishi's will 
as naming Dr. Nader as his heir. Sorry, the Neo archives are very difficult to 
work with. It was some time ago. But if I can find it I'll pass along.

 

________________________________
 From: Steve Sundur <steve.sun...@yahoo.com>
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> 
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2013 5:50 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Boy, did Maharishi get that one right!
  
  
In a nutshell, how did he do that?  Or is there a link to the post where Buck 
goes into that.
 

________________________________
 From: Share Long <sharelon...@yahoo.com>
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> 
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2013 3:01 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Boy, did Maharishi get that one right!
  
  
John, IMO, if anyone can unite the different factions of the TMO, Dr. Nader is 
that person. He reminds me of that Sanskrit saying: in the vicinity of yoga, 
hostile tendencies dissipate. And Buck has told us how he resolved the 
challenge about Maharishi's will.

 

________________________________
 From: "jr_...@yahoo.com" <jr_...@yahoo.com>
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2013 2:53 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Boy, did Maharishi get that one right!
  
  
Share,

Thanks for the additional information.  King Tony has more credentials than I 
thought.  So, it would appear that MMY chose him for his qualifications and 
accomplishments.  But I would also guess that MMY saw something in his jyotish 
chart that would give him the support of Nature in administering the TMO. 

If King Tony has enemies within the organization, who are they and how 
successful are they in their intrigues? 
---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote:
John, Dr. Nader received his MD from American Univ in Beirut  where he also 
studied internal medicine and psychiatry. His PhD from MIT is in Brain and 
Cognitive Science. He did post doc work in Neurology at Mass Gen Hospital, 
Harvard Medical School. With all this, he is a very humble person and radiates 
a full heart. 

 

________________________________
 From: "jr_esq@..." <jr_esq@...>
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2013 2:30 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Boy, did Maharishi get that one right!
  
  
 D Hamilton,

I have not met King Tony in person.  Based on the videos I've seen of him, he 
appears to be a devoted follower of MMY.  Since he's a Phd, I would guess that 
he's a very smart guy.  Also, it appears that he's generally a nice guy. 
---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, <dhamiltony2k5@...> wrote:
 Junior, You been with the guy?  Does his energy field have some
shakti with it?  Hard to tell because he is evidently not available. 
You been with him?  Or, is he just a Raja?  Just wondering.
-Buck
 
  
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 That is fine but clearly some changes are in store for the
program and may be some addendum to the practice.  Does that go
beyond an administrator and take a guru to do with the TM teaching in time? 
-Buck 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
D Hamilton,

IMO, Maharishi was saying that Guru Dev is the teacher of the TM Movement.  
And, King Tony has been designated as the ruler of the TM Movement.  His main 
duty is to spread the teachings based on the wisdom from Guru Dev and the vedic 
interpretations that MMY has provided for the world. 

IOW, King Tony does not have to be a guru.  He is the administrator of the TM 
Movement. 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 It is an interesting thing
that Maharishi in succession planning left no guru behind, but Rajas. There is 
some mystique of folklore around Maharaja Adhiraj Rajaraam. Maharaja Adhiraj 
Rajaraam [MAR] having been kept by Maharishi
incubating spiritually in the basement at Vlodrop, and Maharaja
Adhiraj Rajaraam [MAR] also in Being worth his weight in gold. 
Is he guru material?  Anybody here have a feeling that he is?  Just wondering.
-Buck
 
 

In the East to be a real guru it seems you need to be three things: scholarly 
with chops in traditional texts, knowledgeable about and with spiritual 
techniques to teach, and then having an elemental shaktipat to help people 
spiritually with. If with most the three things then you're ascending to real 
Guru status. If you're really good with all three, then Satguru.    

Shaktipat,  “refers into the conferring of spiritual "energy" upon one person 
by another. Shaktipat can be transmitted with a sacred word or mantra, or by a 
look, thought or touch -” 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
In the East to be a real
guru it seems you need to be three things: scholarly with chops in
traditional texts, knowledgeable about and with spiritual techniques
to teach, and then having an elemental shaktipat to help people
spiritually with.   If with most the three things then you're ascending
to real Guru status.  If you're really good with all three, then Satguru.     

Shaktipat,
 “refers
into the conferring of spiritual "energy" upon one person
by another. Shaktipat can
be transmitted with a sacred word or mantra,
or by a look, thought or touch -”


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Shaktipat,
 “refers
into the conferring of spiritual "energy" upon one person
by another. Shaktipat can
be transmitted with a sacred word or mantra,
or by a look, thought or touch -”  
---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
When searching for a name to call the followers stupid enough to pay him a 
million bucks for the privilege, and looking for one that captured the 
combination of ethics and humility they represented, he certainly couldn't have 
done any better than "Raja" or "Maharaja." 
http://www.wired.com/autopia/2013/09/rolls-royce-tiger-car/                     
          
         

Reply via email to