The nastier an RWC supporter is towards me, and yesterday's posts to Seraphita
were IMO some of the nastiest ever, the more I think they are loyal to RWC in
an unhealthy way.
________________________________
From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" <authfri...@yahoo.com>
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 11:03 AM
Subject: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies
Notice that Share didn't respond to Ann's request for her to say why she thinks
Ann is "obsessed and loyal to RWC in an unhealthy way."
Share is grasping at straws with this "RWC" business. If she can pin the
criticisms of herself to her "upsets" with Robin last year, it enables her to
maintain (falsely) that nothing she has done since has deserved criticism.
But then--ooooopsie!--there's Barry's "SHUT THE FUCK UP" post to Share of
mid-August. Unfortunately that can't be pinned to Share's disgraceful treatment
of Robin last year, given Barry's obvious loathing of the man.
Bottom line, to try to blame that incident for the criticism of Share a year
later (and regularly in between) is exactly what Ann is talking about when she
points to how Share consistently avoids taking responsibility for her behavior,
instead seeking to put the blame on her critics (or other innocuous incidentals
like "too much sugar").
> Ann, I agree that it's good to take responsibility. However, that does not
>include
> giving validity to the observations of those who I think are biased towards me
> because of my upsets with RWC. And that is what I think goes on even to this
> day with some of RWC's supporters, who yes, I think are loyal to him in an
> unhealthy and unbalanced way. Hey, your post reminded me quite a lot of how
> Emily used to write to me.
________________________________
From: "awoelflebater@..." <awoelflebater@...>
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 10:22 AM
Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Richard, like I said to Xeno, some RWC supporters are still mad at me for the
upsets RWC and I had. Some are obsessed IMO and loyal to RWC in an unhealthy
and unbalanced way.
Hey Share, do you think I am obsessed and loyal to RWC in an unhealthy way? If
so, tell me why you think this. If I am not obsessed in a loyal and unhealthy
way then what do you think would explain my difficulties with you at times? You
have gotten oodles and oodles of feedback from lots of posters here - some who
truly like you, some who do not and some who have pretended to like you. We all
get feedback here, directly or indirectly, on how others see us and feel about
our ideas. Some use sledgehammers and others use poetry to get their views
across. What I would love to see is for you to simply take responsibility when
it is appropriate to do that instead of 'blaming' everyone else using reasons
like "obsession" or "unhealthy" or grudge-holding. I don't care how many
hundreds of times you post a day, that is not the issue. What is important to
me is your deflection, constantly, away from yourself of any real 'owning' of
your less than positive, shall
we say, actions and inferences. You either chalk these up to superficial
causes like sugar or planetary influences or to other people's shortfalls. Get
real Share, it feels good.
________________________________
From: Richard J. Williams <punditster@...>
To: Richard J. Williams <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 8:20 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Itzhak Bentov reaches for the skies
Does every message posted to this discussion group have to turn into an
argument with you? Are you the new FFL moderator?
Is it alright with you Judy, if I have a one minute conversation
with Share - just one minute- without you butting in to start
another fight. You'd think that after thirty posts on the Post
Count thread, you'd have said all you need to. I mean, what does
it say about you - it's only 8:00 AM and you already slammed three
people today. LoL!
Sometimes I get the feeling you want the posting limits
reinstated. Go figure.
On 10/2/2013 7:52 AM, authfriend@... wrote:
>>
>
>Share wrote:
>(snip)
>
>Seraphita, in this case, with so many unknown variables, what we conclude
>probably says more about ourselves and our beliefs than it does about Bentov.
>Theoretically Bentov could have seen the no aura situation in the waiting area
>before boarding and then told his wife.
>
>
>Not if it happened as Seraphita described it. What does it say about you that
>you ignored what she wrote ("as he was boarding American Airlines Flight 191
>he realised that no one on the plane had an aura")?
>
>
