Richard, I read this article earlier and postponed sending it to you via FFL. I 
saw Des Moines was on the list. Just for fun, comparing FF to Des Moines:
http://www.bestplaces.net/cost-of-living/fairfield-ia/des-moines-ia/50000





On Thursday, October 17, 2013 3:02 PM, Richard Williams <pundits...@gmail.com> 
wrote:
 
  
So, who wants to pay all that money for a house to live in when you're always 
busy working to pay for it? It's like you have to pay for a car to get to work 
so you can pay for the car. The definition of a home is 'a place to put stuff, 
while you're out buying more stuff'. You can live in your car, but you can't 
drive your house to work - unless it's an RV. So, where can a person live on 
$75 a Day?

San Antonio:



"You don't need a huge nest egg to retire well, especially if you're willing to 
move to a place with a low cost of living. Relocating to one of these places 
could help you to get by on a combination of Social Security and a small amount 
of savings, or allow you to retire younger or maintain a better lifestyle than 
you could in a more expensive city."

'The Best Places to Retire on $75 a Day'
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/

Living on $5,000 a year, on purpose: Meet America's 'intentional poor'
http://inplainsight.nbcnews.com/

Reply via email to