Bhairitu wrote: > Because you always accuse me of being a conspiracy theorist. So I joshed > you back on it.
OK, Bhairitu, I'm going to take pity on you. You assumed my remark--that the shooting incident was carefully planned to distract attention from the food stamp cuts--was serious. It wasn't. I was making fun of your tendency to see conspiracies everywhere. That's why your "retort" was hilarious. You fell for it hook, line, and sinker. You are so GULLIBLE. > Yes it did distract. No we don't know if it was a planned incident or not. Here's a hint: It wasn't planned, except by the shooter. Given how corrupt this country and government is it could have been a planned incident. Here's an LA TV news report with a guy who was there. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osi0I9q0WmY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osi0I9q0WmY On 11/03/2013 11:38 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: Bhairitu, why would you make fun of me for suggesting that the shooting incident was carefully planned to distract attention from the food stamp cuts? I mean, it did, did it not? You yourself commented on that. Bhairitu wrote: I don't get what people think they see. I've checked both my emails and web site and see nothing unusual. Perhaps there was an ad or something people are somehow confusing with my post? Or maybe they are confused about my joke of calling Judy a conspiracy theorist an fun retort given her first response to my post. Or maybe you all think you are screwing with my but then you're wasting your time. On 11/03/2013 09:05 AM, emilymaenot@... mailto:emilymaenot@... wrote: It struck me as very funny personally coming from Bhairitu, perhaps inadvertently ironic? ---In [email protected] mailto:[email protected], <[email protected]> mailto:[email protected] wrote: LOL. No, has nothing to do with punctuation or spelling. Nothing to do with the details of the story, either. Try again. Bhairitu wrote: You and Dixon must be imagining something or it got screwed up on the web site. The is no gaffe in this line: "Judy, the conspiracy theorist." If you are talking about the comma then you need a new Strunk and White. But if you are talking about the shooting was between two TSA agents that's what the news outlets were saying when I posted it. They later recanted. There are no misspellings even though Thunderbird is fucked up and random these days about underlining misspellings. But who really cares about that on a message board anyway? On 11/02/2013 09:52 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: I'm just going to let you figure that out, Bhairitu. It's not too difficult. Mike Dixon got it. Bhairitu wrote: > And exactly what gaffe might that be? On 11/02/2013 09:17 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: Even when you call a gaffe to Bhairitu's attention, he doesn't see it. Bhairitu wrote: > Be careful where you step. Judy has lost her marbles again. Must be a sign > of her advancing old age. On 11/01/2013 03:13 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: Er, Bhairitu... No, never mind, I'll just let this sit here for people to snicker at: Bhairitu bumbled: > Judy, the conspiracy theorist. On 11/01/2013 12:30 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: Yes, clearly the shooting incident was carefully planned to distract attention from the food stamp cuts. ---In [email protected] mailto:[email protected], <[email protected]> mailto:[email protected] wrote: Well the TSA shooting at LAX which was between a couple of TSA agents seems to have knocked off what should have been the lead article on the news: the food stamp cuts that went into effect today (how convenient). http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/01/food-stamps-snap-cuts-farm-bill/3346341/ http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/01/food-stamps-snap-cuts-farm-bill/3346341/ The war on the poor by the rich ramps up. Time to organize and go after the rich. Let's party like it's Greece and Spain.
