Buck, the Group Description does say that any topic is fair game. As horrifying
as this story is, I think it's essential for people to know about it, whether
those people are spiritual or not, religious or not, political or not. If we
are to be fully developed human beings, we must, I think, bring to bear our
awareness and concern and outrage onto such stories. It's part of taking a
stand for whatever we hold dear, whether we call that spiritual or just being
truly human.
On Saturday, November 9, 2013 6:30 AM, "dhamiltony...@yahoo.com"
<dhamiltony...@yahoo.com> wrote:
This tread is an example
of what? Spiritual decorum? Could folks here please read the home
page description for Fairfield Life. Could someone please relate
this thread to our more particular spiritual concerns on this list
here or remove it or remove themselves for straying so far from
topic. Content and context. It clearly is time to bring back the
FFL post limit to the community here. I vote for 30 posts max per
week. If our dear dear FFL moderator will run the post-count script
I would be glad to remove people from posting who can't control
themselves.
Yours in Consciousness of
the Unified Field,
-Buck
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote:
The guy has filed a federal lawsuit suiing the police and the hospital for
violation of his 4th Amendment rights and is also suing the doctors for
malpractice. The whole story has gone viral, and a second one like it has now
turned up. The first guy is likely to get a fat settlement; what they did to
him is way beyond the pale.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <s3raphita@...> wrote:
It seems that David Eckert has to pay the costs of the anal probes he endured!
Can he claim the money back on Obamacare?
---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, <s3raphita@...> wrote:
David Eckert failed to make a complete stop when he pulled out of a Walmart
store. A police officer then asked David to get out of his car and claimed he
saw Eckert "clenching his buttocks" which supposedly was a sign that Eckert had
drugs in his anal cavity.
1. Eckert’s abdominal area was X-rayed; no narcotics were found.
2. Doctors then performed an examination of Eckert’s anus with their
fingers; no narcotics were found.
3. Doctors performed a second exam of Eckert’s anus with their fingers;
no narcotics were found.
4. Doctors penetrated Eckert’s anus to insert an enema. Eckert was
forced to defecate in front of doctors and police officers. Eckert watched as
doctors searched his stool. No narcotics were found.
5. Doctors penetrated Eckert’s anus to insert an enema a second time.
Eckert was forced to defecate in front of doctors and police officers. Eckert
watched as doctors searched his stool. No narcotics were found.
6. Doctors penetrated Eckert’s anus to insert an enema a third time.
Eckert was forced to defecate in front of doctors and police officers. Eckert
watched as doctors searched his stool. No narcotics were found.
7. Doctors then X-rayed Eckert again; no narcotics were found.
8. Doctors prepared Eckert for surgery, sedated him, and then performed
a colonoscopy where a scope with a camera was inserted into Eckert’s anus,
rectum, colon, and large intestines. No narcotics were
found.http://tinyurl.com/k86d9dv
