Buck, once I witnessed police brutality and when a sign asked for witnesses, I 
came forward and told what I had seen. Other than that, I do what we all do. I 
do what I can to become a better human being myself. So that I'm contributing 
to the solution rather than to the problem.




On Saturday, November 9, 2013 6:58 AM, "dhamiltony...@yahoo.com" 
<dhamiltony...@yahoo.com> wrote:
 
  
There's lots of tragedy
and injustice to be read in the news otherwise.  So what are you
going to do about it?  These post as they are have nothing to do with
FFL as they are posted.  The FFL home page says “almost”
anything.  These posts as they are made have nothing to do with FFL. 
Content and Context.  These authors are lazy and should be proscribed
from posting any further shit like this thread without context
related to FFL.  
More later, I'm off to the
Dome to meditate this morning,
I want justice for FFL.
I want moderation to
return to the FFL community.
-Buck


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote:


Buck, the Group Description does say that any topic is fair game. As horrifying 
as this story is, I think it's essential for people to know about it, whether 
those people are spiritual or not, religious or not, political or not. If we 
are to be fully developed human beings, we must, I think, bring to bear our 
awareness and concern and outrage onto such stories. It's part of taking a 
stand for whatever we hold dear, whether we call that spiritual or just being 
truly human. 





On Saturday, November 9, 2013 6:30 AM, "dhamiltony2k5@..." <dhamiltony2k5@...> 
wrote:
 
  
 This tread is an example
of what?  Spiritual decorum?  Could folks here please read the home
page description for Fairfield Life.  Could someone please relate
this thread to our more particular spiritual concerns on this list
here or remove it or remove themselves for straying so far from
topic.  Content and context.  It clearly is time to bring back the
FFL post limit to the community here.  I vote for 30 posts max per
week.  If our dear dear FFL moderator will run the post-count script
I would be glad to remove people from posting who can't control
themselves.
Yours in Consciousness of
the Unified Field,
-Buck    


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote:


The guy has filed a federal lawsuit suiing the police and the hospital for 
violation of his 4th Amendment rights and is also suing the doctors for 
malpractice. The whole story has gone viral, and a second one like it has now 
turned up. The first guy is likely to get a fat settlement; what they did to 
him is way beyond the pale. 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <s3raphita@...> wrote:


It seems that David Eckert has to pay the costs of the anal probes he endured! 
Can he claim the money back on Obamacare?


---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, <s3raphita@...> wrote:


David Eckert failed to make a complete stop when he pulled out of a Walmart 
store. A police officer then asked David to get out of his car and claimed he 
saw Eckert "clenching his buttocks" which supposedly was a sign that Eckert had 
drugs in his anal cavity. 

        1. Eckert’s abdominal area was X-rayed; no narcotics were found.
        2. Doctors then performed an examination of Eckert’s anus with their 
fingers; no narcotics were found.
        3. Doctors performed a second exam of Eckert’s anus with their fingers; 
no narcotics were found.
        4. Doctors penetrated Eckert’s anus to insert an enema. Eckert was 
forced to defecate in front of doctors and police officers. Eckert watched as 
doctors searched his stool. No narcotics were found.
        5. Doctors penetrated Eckert’s anus to insert an enema a second time. 
Eckert was forced to defecate in front of doctors and police officers. Eckert 
watched as doctors searched his stool. No narcotics were found.
        6. Doctors penetrated Eckert’s anus to insert an enema a third time. 
Eckert was forced to defecate in front of doctors and police officers. Eckert 
watched as doctors searched his stool. No narcotics were found.
        7. Doctors then X-rayed Eckert again; no narcotics were found.
        8. Doctors prepared Eckert for surgery, sedated him, and then performed 
a colonoscopy where a scope with a camera was inserted into Eckert’s anus, 
rectum, colon, and large intestines. No narcotics were 
found.http://tinyurl.com/k86d9dv



Reply via email to