From a NYTimes op-ed entitled "Why Do Brits Accept Surveillance?"
 

 "In Parliament, a few maverick individuals have raised concerns about civil 
liberties and privacy. When others have mentioned the subject, it’s mostly been 
to accuse The Guardian of damaging national security, rather than to ask 
whether the intelligence agencies have gone too far.
 

 "What explains this reaction — so at odds with the response in the United 
States, where Congress is reviewing its oversight arrangements and where 
everyone from President  Obama on down has acknowledged that a  debate is 
necessary, if not overdue...?"
 

 Read more:
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/09/opinion/why-do-brits-accept-surveillance.html?ref=opinion
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/09/opinion/why-do-brits-accept-surveillance.html?ref=opinion

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <turquoiseb@...> wrote:

 Worried about the guvmint snooping on your email or phone calls, or your 
online presence? Small potatoes, and useless to worry about. If you have a 
face, they already know everything about you.

http://cironline.org/reports/facial-recognition-once-battlefield-tool-lands-san-diego-county-5502?utm_source=CIR&utm_medium=social_media&utm_campaign=tumblr
 
http://cironline.org/reports/facial-recognition-once-battlefield-tool-lands-san-diego-county-5502?utm_source=CIR&utm_medium=social_media&utm_campaign=tumblr
 

http://reason.com/blog/2013/07/01/just-how-reliable-and-widespread-is-fbi 
http://reason.com/blog/2013/07/01/just-how-reliable-and-widespread-is-fbi 




Reply via email to