John, I agree that something about it does not feel right though if no force is involved it seems legal enough. It seems like a win win but is it also a win for the child? And it definitely indicates an unhealthy imbalance in the world that a woman would have to earn money by bearing another person's child. I could support it if there were guarantees that the child and surrogate mother would remain in contact. But that seems unlikely. So I say, keep looking for other solutions to both problems.
On Friday, November 8, 2013 5:19 PM, "jr_...@yahoo.com" <jr_...@yahoo.com> wrote: That probably cost them about $100,000 since it was done here in the US. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <noozguru@...> wrote: A rich friend did that with their second child because the wife had a hard time carrying the first one. They used a US surrogate though. On 11/08/2013 11:56 AM, jr_esq@... wrote: > >They're apparently becoming a thriving business in the country, and have >become the solution for infertile couples in the US and elsewhere in the world. > > >One wonders about the ethics regarding this practice. > > >http://gma.yahoo.com/infertile-americans-india-gestational-surrogates-111533378--abc-news-health.html >
