Jeez. Sure there's some inflexibility on both sides, but the mindsets that are 
inflexible are different. Xenophobia, e.g., is part of that mindset on the 
right, but not on the left. And I'd say xenophobia is very much a self-centered 
viewpoint.
 

 As to stupidity, my point, in response to the article Barry posted, was that 
to the degree that right-wingers are stupid, it's not because their religion is 
stupid, contrary to what the author claimed. That's why I posted the statement 
from the National Evangelical Association, which is clearly not stupid.
 

 Here in this country, we've been trying to talk to the right for a couple of 
decades now, and the bullheaded resistance from the far end of the spectrum has 
only gotten worse. Political debate with them has long since become pointless. 
Even the Republican establishment has become disturbed by it, according to the 
NYTimes article I linked to. I don't know what the answer is, but talking 
doesn't do any good if the people you're talking to aren't listening.
 

 It looks like the exercise of political muscle by the non-Tea Party 
Republicans--withholding support, financial and otherwise, from the extremist 
candidates--is the only viable approach. If they can't get elected, they can't 
do as much damage. Goodness knows the establishment Republicans are no picnic, 
but they aren't crazy-stupid.
 

 And we can't give in to the threat of violence by catering to the extremists. 
They have to be opposed and politically marginalized, neutralized.
 

 



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <s3raphita@...> wrote:

 "My point was that stupidity is a characteristic of right-wingers . . . The 
stupidity has much more to do with a certain inflexible and self-centred 
mindset":
 

 Come on! The inflexible mindset is a characteristic shared across the 
political spectrum - left, right, centre. And there have, on occasion, been 
highly intelligent people on both sides of the left-right divide. On the right, 
I'd mention Ezra Pound and Céline. Both were highly articulate - but both were 
full-on anti-Semites and it's that xenophobia (rather than the stupidity) of 
the right that is the more worrying issue to me.
 

 The trouble with dismissing your political opponents as stupid is that, if 
true, they are clearly not worth wasting time talking to. And once political 
debate becomes pointless people feel justified in turning to violence.
 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote:

 Of course there are no one-to-one correspondences between right wings, just 
some strong similarities on specific issues (in the case of the U.S. and 
Europe, the biggie with their right wings seems to be immigration, especially 
Muslim immigration). As the article Barry cited points out, the specific issues 
the U.S. right wing is fixated on are mostly not theological (abortion and 
homosexuality being the major exceptions).
 

 My point was that stupidity is a characteristic of the right-wingers, not 
their religion per se. The religion itself is almost incidental. The stupidity 
has much more to do with a certain inflexible and self-centered mindset, so the 
fact that other countries' right wings aren't religious is basically irrelevant.
 

Seraphita wrote:

 Something I wanted to add. Re "it seems like the U.S. isn't the only country 
that has problems with its right wing.":
  
 You are, no doubt, well aware that no other country has a right-wing voting 
bloc like your US right? The whole "religious-right" cause has zero appeal 
elsewhere - except in Islamic republics ;-) 
 And the tiny-state, full-on, free-market capitalism approach is probably these 
days only advocated in the Far East - Hong Kong, Singapore, . . .
 

 All the right-wing parties in Europe are pro-welfare state parties - and the 
further to the right they are, the more welfarism they support. They are 
basically "national" socialist parties - but no one wants to invade other 
countries any more. It would be interesting to find out how many of the 
policies of Euro rightists would be to the left of your Democrats!
 

 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote:

 Oh, hmmm, it seems like the U.S. isn't the only country that has problems with 
its right wing.
 

 From an article in today's NYTimes entitled, "Right Wing’s Surge in Europe Has 
the Establishment Rattled":
 

 "...All over, established political forces are losing ground to politicians 
whom they scorn as fear-mongering populists. In France, according to a recent 
opinion poll, the far-right National Front has become the country’s most 
popular party. In other countries — Austria, Britain, Bulgaria, the Czech 
Republic, Finland and the Netherlands — disruptive upstart groups are on a roll.
 

 "This phenomenon alarms not just national leaders but also officials in 
Brussels who fear that European Parliament elections next May could 
substantially tip the balance of power toward nationalists and forces intent on 
halting or reversing integration within the European Union...."
 

 Read more:
 

 
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/09/world/europe/right-wings-surge-in-europe-has-the-establishment-rattled.html
 

 


 



 


Reply via email to