LOL, Judy, Judy, Judy, you remind me of the story of 2 brahmacharyas who came to a river and saw a beautiful, young girl drowning there. The older of the monks jumped in and carried her to the opposite shore. Then he and the young monk continued their journey. A little later the young monk got upset with the old monk for breaking their vows by touching a woman. The old monk wisely noted that he had left her at the river. But the young monk, who had not touched her at all, was still carrying her.
Flow on, Judy, flow on! On Friday, November 15, 2013 10:02 AM, "authfri...@yahoo.com" <authfri...@yahoo.com> wrote: Share is so fortunate to have a defender like Barry, isn't she? An Open Message To Share turquoiseb Mon, 12 Aug 2013 22:51:44 -0700 SHUT THE FUCK UP We get it that you don't care how unintelligent you come across, and that you're trying to single-handedly prove the contention of anti-TM critics that TMers are blissninnies without a brain cell in their thick skulls who will believe anything if they're told its Woo Woo enough. But do you have to be such a codependent, attention-seeking masochist about it? Not only have you been making yourself the object of pursuit of your Jr. High School-mentality tormentors, you've been doing it *purposefully*. For fuck's sake, STOP. You're even more boring than they are as they chase you endlessly like a dog chases a ball. The "mean girls" trying to "get" you are an embarrassment to the notion of humans having compassion, but you're an embarrassment to the notion of humans having intelligence. They're doing this because they have no choice; they're the dogs in this scenario: [https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/q71/1002189_1015\ 1783564220211_2025423059_n.jpg] You're doing it because you're not terribly smart, or interesting, and you crave attention anyway. And you don't fucking care whether you drag a whole forum down to your level of idiocy to get it. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <turquoiseb@...> wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ann wrote: > >> > ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@ wrote: >> > >> > Emily, it is and has been a pleasure for me to read posts >> > from just about all the men on FFL The posts of the >> > MGC? Not so much. Silly me!. >> >> Men! Listen up. You are providing a necessary community >> service when you 'stimulate' Share with your attention and >> ideas. Keep up the good work. Mean Girls need not apply. > >Mean Girls need not apply for membership in the human race. They don't qualify. > Are all the girls here "mean" BTW? > >The only ones we can be fairly certain fall into the Mean Girls category are the ones who have been piling on to Share ever since one of them got called on being a faux feminist. That would be Judy, Ann, and Emily. This behavior is about as *anti-feminist* as it gets. Personally I think Share should just write all three of them off as if they don't exist, but she compassionately still interacts with them, as she does with the other attention troll, Willytex. Waste 'o fuckin' time, if you ask me, but so be it, and better her than me.
