Oh, so am I. It was just fun to see it all together like that, one conspiracy theory after another. I thought they did a pretty good job of presenting them neutrally, although every once in a while you could spot just a wee bit of tongue tucked in cheek.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <noozguru@...> wrote: Thanks. Of course I am very familiar with a lot of this stuff. I was suspicious of the JFK assassination from day one. Things just didn't add up. BTW, the easier way to read the article is to go back to it's main page where one can select the different sections. On 11/20/2013 02:44 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: You might enjoy looking through this: New York magazine this week has a neat feature, a "Conspiracy Theory Compendium." It's not about debunking *or* promoting the theories of the last 50 years, just listing them and giving a bit of background. Some of the entries are long; others are only a paragraph or two. And there's an interview with Alex Jones at the end. The compendium starts here; at the bottom of each item is a link to the next one. This is a very long one: http://nymag.com/news/features/conspiracy-theories/jfk-murder/ http://nymag.com/news/features/conspiracy-theories/jfk-murder/
