Well, I figure nobody wants to dialog with Judy tonight.
On 11/27/2013 9:09 PM, Share Long wrote:
Go figure!
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 9:06 PM, Share Long
<sharelon...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Judy asked if there was an echo in here. I guess she hasn't noticed
how many times she's posted about refutation, etc.
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 9:02 PM, Richard J. Williams
<pundits...@gmail.com> wrote:
This your your style I guess.
On 11/27/2013 6:03 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com
<mailto:authfri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
*This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes
Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. *
**
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>, <punditster@...>
<mailto:punditster@...> wrote:
I've been an respondent on the internet since 1999, so it's not like
I'm a newbie or something. And it's been my observation that Judy has
a really big ego, maybe bigger even than Barry, and that's saying a
lot! There are facts and there are opinions - facts can be argued,
but an opinion stands no matter what, and that's everyone's right to
express - you may not agree, but there should be no excuse for
slandering your debating opponents.
It's like when some people call others 'nazis' all the time - it soon
loses its force, and in the end doesn't do justice to the real nazi
victims.
At first I thought Judy was being very astute when she called Barry a
liar over and over again; then she started going after me with the
same tactic. For awhile I thought there was something wrong with me
and that maybe I did lack integrity. But now, after Judy called Buck
a liar for no reason at all, I've come to the conclusion that Judy is
simply a well-poisoner.
That's her style I guess.
Hey, I'm all for truthfulness and personal integrity, but I'm just
not sure dialoging with anonymous informants in an online chat-room
is the place to prove it - this is supposed to fun, not a trial by a
one-person judge and jury.
But, it has reached a level now that she's calling almost everyone a
liar, a troll, and/or a poser.
At this point, she's just a very unpleasant person to deal with and
not very informative either. And, there's no relief when anyone
starts up a dialog with her - it's incessant and endless. Barry is a
case in point - from what I can tell, Judy carries a grudge for a
very, very long time. Go figure.
P.S. You may have noticed that Judy does NOT respond very elegantly
to constructive criticism. If anyone can point to an untruth I've
posted, please let me know and point my error - be specific, so we
can resolve any misunderstandings. Thanks in advance.
On 11/27/2013 10:33 AM, Share Long wrote:
I think Truth is something huge, that cannot really be completely
conveyed in words alone. Unless the speaker or writer is
communicating from a very settled and integrated level of
consciousness. OTOH, unless someone has a nefarious intention, I
think most people try to communicate truthfully. But each of us is
limited by our connection to Truth. The most trustworthy people,
imho, are those who recognize this and intend to become more and
more truthful.
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 9:21 AM, Richard J. Williams
<punditster@...> <mailto:punditster@...> wrote:
Maybe, but I almost always suspect someone of not being totally
honest when they post as an anonymous informant. I used to post
under various handles until I got outed, and so I decided when I
retired, I would just use my real name. I've got nothing to hide and
nobody can fire me from my job since I'm self-employed now. But
using a handle is no biggie to me because I understand why some
people need to keep their privacy.
But, I did get a little paranoid reading Bill's post where he
claimed Ravi had stalked or threatened, to what - expose Bill and
his wife. What's up with that?
That's when things get REALLY nasty around here - I wouldn't blame
Rick if he shut down the whole discussion group, if that's what
going to happen here on a regular basis! It is always troubling to
see someone get banned from the group. Where I used to work, you had
to really screw up big time to get fired - like smoking pot in the
parking lot or something like that. Hardly anyone gets banned on FFL
- Kirk got banned for cursing too. Go figure.
And, I don't care if people post mean things about me sometimes - it
could always just be a joke of some kind - like when Barry2 posted
that my real name was Walter White. LoL!
On 11/27/2013 8:49 AM, anartaxius@... <mailto:anartaxius@...> wrote:
/*10 Ways Liars Use Words To Obscure the Truth*/
http://liespotting.com/liespotting-basics/words/
We are not face-to-face on FFL, it's all words, words, words.
There are those here who make a big deal of their integrity.
Perhaps that is a suspect trait.
