It's not complicated: In one post Judy says the TM bijas are not the
names of the Hindu gods. In the other post, she denies posting that the
TM bija are not the names of the Hindu gods.
So, which is it? Did Judy post that the TM bijas are not the names of
the Hindu gods, or didn't she?
It looks like to me that Judy posted that the TM bijas are not the names
of the Hindu gods, so why would she deny posting that, when it's right
there in the archives?
From the archives:
Judy posted:
"Richard is lying. I never said anything about "the technique," whatever
it is, or was. Nor did I say the bijas weren't "nicknames" of the
deities (whatever "nicknames" means in this context)."
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/364436
Judy posted:
"Just for example, the TM mantras are *not* the names of the
Hindu gods. The Hindu gods have perfectly good names of
their own."
https://groups.google.com/forum/alt.meditation.transcendental
On 11/28/2013 10:13 AM, emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Yes, they can Richard. That's what I don't understand and why I was
asking. If you can't explain said allegation, why don't you let let
it go? It appears to be taking up valuable space in your brain. You
and Rita have a good day.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <punditster@...> wrote:
It's not complicated: Judy posted both statements, both can't be true.
On 11/27/2013 9:54 PM, emilymaenot@... <mailto:emilymaenot@...> wrote:
Richard, seriously, I just don't understand what you are saying here.
Instead of reposting and reposting the same thing, can you, in
detail, explain how, based on the words in the two sentences in
question, you are coming to said conclusion of Judy "lying?" If you
are all bent out of shape about Judy, just objectively review the two
statements and explain how the two sentences that you keep reposting
proves a "lie."
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>, <punditster@...>
<mailto:punditster@...> wrote:
Well, I'm quoting it because you posted it. You're not doing a very
good job of explaining what you meant. So, did you or did you not
post this?
"Richard is lying. I never said anything about "the technique,"
whatever it is, or was. Nor did I say the bijas weren't "nicknames"
of the deities (whatever "nicknames" means in this context)."
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/364436
"Just for example, the TM mantras are *not* the names of the
Hindu gods. The Hindu gods have perfectly good names of
their own."
https://groups.google.com/forum/alt.meditation.transcendental
<https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#%21topic/alt.meditation.transcendental/1bJzUyLPecQ>
P.S. This may be lost on you, but I'm pretty sure Barry and Share can
understand what you posted. It looks to me like you are trying to
wiggle out of owning your own words. Not that anyone cares what you
say these days,anyway. Go figure.
On 11/27/2013 3:50 PM, authfriend@... <mailto:authfriend@...> wrote:
I don't know why you keep quoting stuff that documents the fact that
you were lying, but that's your problem.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>, <punditster@...>
<mailto:punditster@...> wrote:
The most reliable proof is to post the message number and the URL to
the actual words, like when I posted your own words and the URL to
see them, and you still called me a liar.
"Richard is lying. I never said anything about "the technique,"
whatever it is, or was. Nor did I say the bijas weren't "nicknames"
of the deities (whatever "nicknames" means in this context)."
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/364436
"...the TM mantras are *not* the names of the Hindu gods. The Hindu
gods have perfectly good names of their own."
Subject: Re: do you ever repeat your mantra when you are asleep and
dreaming?
Author: Judy Stein
Newsgroups: alt.meditation.transcendental
Date: Sat, Dec 17 2005 1:22 pm
http://tinyurl.com/9gxse
On 11/27/2013 9:11 AM, authfriend@... <mailto:authfriend@...> wrote:
*Hey, Barry, have a look at this. It's fascinating. *
*
Xeno wrote:
*
/*10 Ways Liars Use Words To Obscure the Truth*/
http://liespotting.com/liespotting-basics/words/
We are not face-to-face on FFL, it's all words, words,
words. There are those here who make a big deal of their
integrity. Perhaps that is a suspect trait.
*Um, or perhaps not. /Legitimately/ suspect, that is.*
Me, I think the most reliable way to tell if someone is a
liar is whether there is documented evidence that they have
lied. (That's why a functioning Search feature is so
frightening to Barry.)
