Oh this is great! lol!
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:49 AM, <awoelfleba...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote: > > See Barry. See Barry stalk Judy. Stalk, stalk, stalk. Nothing new here; > move along, folks. > > > I wrote: > > > Buck, reflect a minute. What makes you think I "stalk"? > > > Barry replied: > > > > You mean, other than the fact that you're doing it right now? :-) > > > > When you go out of your way to write a post dumping on the person you've > been dumping on consistently for nearly twenty years, about whom you've > written literally thousands of posts dumping on him, you're stalking. > > > You mean, the way you've gone out of your way to write posts dumping on me > and have done relentlessly for nearly twenty years over thousands of posts, > and are doing right now? That's what you mean by "stalking," what you've > been spending most of your time on the Web doing to me and many others ever > since I've known you? > > > > Get over your self-delusions, honey...you're a stalker. > > > Well, that's an interesting definition. Trouble is, it applies to you far > more than it does to me. You da talker-in-chief, sweet cheeks. > > > I didn't "go out of my way" to write the post, BTW. As you know, I was > responding to Buck. > > > If I'm a "stalker" according to your new definition, at least I'm an > honest stalker. You are a viciously malicious, profoundly and consistently > dishonest stalker. That was (as you know) my point to Buck. We'll see a > demonstration in the very next paragraphs: > > > > You even stalked Curtis recently when one of your former minions said he > liked him, and he hasn't been here since August: > > > You mean, after Dr. Dumbass responded to one of your long dump-on-Judy > rants that fawned over Curtis? In which he said he liked Curtis but found > him "emotionally duplicitous," and I agreed? Because that's the post of > mine you're quoting, along with my follow-up: > > > "Curtis, in stark contrast, went to considerable lengths to hide his > emotional duplicity." > > > "To be a little more specific, if I may: Curtis pretended to be > "comfortable" with who he was, as Barry puts it. But that was a carefully > constructed facade, and it took very little in the way of chipping to > expose the real Curtis underneath. " > > > *You went on to stalk Dr. Dumbass for what he had said about Curtis, and > in that post added Robin to your list of stalkees for the day--Robin, who > hadn't been here since early April.* > > > *Did you think I wasn't going to provide the context you dishonestly left > out? (And it was obviously deliberate dishonesty, folks, since he had > actually looked up the posts in question.)* > > > *If anybody would like to verify what I just wrote, let me know and I'll > provide the URLs to the posts.* > > > *As I said in a post a couple of days ago, Barry doesn't have the > wherewithal to make an honest case. He'd have to refrain from stalking if > he had to be honest, because he'd have nothing to say.* > > > > Stalking is just what you DO, Judy. Everyone here knows this but you. > > > *Says the Master Stalker of FFL.* > > > *Your hypocrisy is unparalleled. It's stupefying. And that's giving you > the benefit of the doubt, because if you really believe what you're saying, > you're insane, completely out of touch with reality.* > > > *Now, how do you explain your claim that I have "stalked you from forum to > forum"?* > > > *(See, Barry has switched definitions. Before, he meant "stalking" in the > standard sense of following someone around, as in his claim above. But now > he's using it as a synonym for "dumping on.")* > > > *How about explaining the fact that you were "stalking" me on FFL before I > even arrived here?* > > > *I can find the URLs for those posts as well if anyone is interested.* > > > *I swear to God, interacting with Barry is like being in a hall of > funhouse mirrors. Everything he says is warped, twisted, turned inside-out > and upside-down. And the older he becomes, the worse it gets. It's hard to > imagine that he genuinely thinks anybody believes him, but it's even harder > to understand why he would constantly spout such obviously dishonest crap > if he didn't.* > > > Like I said once before and I still stand by it, "Barry is a freak of > nature." > > > *I wrote to Buck:* > > > I'll tell you: Because that's what Barry has said that I do, over and > over. He claims I've "stalked him from forum to forum." That is factually > untrue. Of the four forums we've been on together, one (alt.m.t) I joined > before I had ever encountered him; two I joined before he did; and the > fourth, FFL, he Invited me to join, along with other members of alt.m.t. > > > > > > So what does that make Barry, Buck? > > > > > > I could go on and on listing the things Barry has said about me (and > others) that were simply factually false, and that he knows were false. > Literally hundreds of things. > > >
