This is a wonderful story, Richard, and one that I've never heard before, thank 
you for posting. Next time I sweep snow off the front deck, I'll pay closer 
attention to the sound of the broom on the wood. There's hope for me yet!





On Thursday, December 12, 2013 7:41 AM, Richard J. Williams 
<pundits...@gmail.com> wrote:
 
  
It's like a zen koan: You can think of this way - there are souls, but no 
over-soul; you have a soul while you are living, but not an eternal soul; when 
you pass away, there's no permanent soul to reincarnate; but there may be 
left-over karma that you have to deal with; so there is rebirth, so you can 
continue to deal with, to work it out, your past karma; so you can become 
enlightened, liberated, from the endless round of becoming.

Excerpt paraphrased from 'Buddha Speaks:'
  
"One day a bright and intelligent student of the Buddha asked if
      he could fetch his younger brother to join the order. Delighted,
      the Buddha agreed. But the younger brother, although kind and
      gentle, turned out to be slow and dull witted. He could understand
      nothing of his studies and asked to go home so that he wouldn't
      waste the Buddha's time or let down his brother. "There's no need
      for you to give up," said the Buddha. "You should not abandon your
      search for liberation just because you seem to yourself to be
      thick witted. You can drop all the philosophy you've been given
      and repeat a mantra instead - one that I will now give you." 
  
He gave the young monk a mantra and sent him away affectionately.
      But soon the monk was back, this time even more humiliated. "My
      beloved Buddha, I can't remember the mantra you gave me and so I
      can no longer practice." The Buddha kindly repeated it for him.
      But twice more he came back, having forgotten it each time. So the
      Buddha gave him a simplified form. But when this too slipped
      completely out of his mind, he hardly dared visit the Buddha
      again. "There's an even shorter version," the Buddha told him,
      with a smile, "It's just two syllables. See if you can remember
      that." But he could not.
  
In his hut, he broke down and wept. His brother found him and was
      furious, feeling that his own reputation was now sullied. He told
      the young monk to go home, and so the boy left the hut and sadly
      made his way along the path. As he neared a grove of trees, he met
      the Buddha coming from it. The Buddha smiled and took his hand.
      Together they went to a temple where two old monks were sweeping
      the floor. The Buddha said to them: "This young monk will live
      here with you from now on. Continue your sweeping, and as your
      broom moves back and forth, listen to the sound of the broom.
      Don't stop until I come back." 

The young monk sat down and listened to the movement of the
      brooms, to and fro over the floor. He heard the whispered rhythm
      of the broom sound as it was repeated over and over again. This
      went on for many months, and before the Buddha came back, the
      young monk had found full liberation and so had the two old
      monks."  
  
Work Cited:
  
'Buddha Speaks'
by Anne Bancroft
Shambhala Publications 2000
Chapter on Clarity, From the Majjhima Nikaya
p. 47

The above is an excerpt from a great book from Shambhala
      Publications, by Anne Bancroft, author of the classic 'Zen: Direct
      Pointing to Reality.' A must read for anyone aspiring to the
      Middle Way and or for the plain curious TMer, as to what the
      Buddha actually said. Authoritative. Scholarly. Destined to be a
      classic. Beautifully bound and designed. Affordable. Available at
      Barnes and Noble and Amazon.

On 12/12/2013 6:47 AM, Share Long wrote:

  
>Richard, if it's all just an appearance then I guess there's no one to reply 
>to. And no one replying either! Is everything a metaphor for everything else? 
>(-:
>
>
>
>On Thursday, December 12, 2013 6:21 AM, Richard Williams 
><pundits...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>  
>The problem here is that there's no blonde on either side - it's all just an 
>appearance. 
>
>
>In reality, there's nobody to be blonde, no sides at all, and no going over 
>either. We talk as if there was another shore on the other side and a boat 
>that takes us over, but those are just conventions of speech- a metaphor.And, 
>what's a meta for? A metaphor is for dummies that don't understand and can't 
>experience directly the way things really are. Go figure.
>
>
>
>On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 2:53 AM, TurquoiseB <turquoi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>  
>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams" wrote:
>>>
>>> That's like a zen
                                                  koan:
>>> 
>>> "You need a boat
                                                  to cross over to the
                                                  other side. But, once
                                                  you cross 
>>> over, you find
                                                  that there is no other
                                                  side and no crossing
                                                  over. This 
>>> being so, you
                                                  would look foolish
                                                  carrying a boat around
                                                  on top of your 
>>> head."
>>
>>I prefer the version of the koan in the Blonde Joke Sutras:
>>
>>A brunette on the
                                                      shore of a river
                                                      sees a blonde on
                                                      the other side of
                                                      the river and
                                                      shouts out,
                                                      "Hey...how do I
                                                      get to the other
                                                      side?
>>
>>The blonde shouts
                                                      back, "You *are*
                                                      on the other
                                                      side."
>>
>>:-)
> 
>

Reply via email to