It's typical Judy-speak. She's been doing this for years. She did it
with Barry, with me, with Curtis, with Vaj, and even with Lawson. She
will latch on to some minor point of contention and just obsess on it to
no end, long after anyone else even knows what she is talking about.
Then she will clam up and refuse to engage in any meaningful dialog.
Why is it so difficult for her to post her reasons for the dislike? Is
it my face, or where I live, or my political point of view? She
obviously has a way with words and is intelligent. I can understand the
shunning from Barry, but at least he's not trying to ankle-bite me when
I pass by every day. And, it is kind of funny to watch Barry push her
buttons, you've got to admit. LoL!
Then, she will incessantly post slanderous remarks in an attempt to sway
others to join her in a shunning. She even gets others to join in, Bill
is a case in point. Why in the world would Bill call me a troll for
trying to engage him in a spiritual conversation? It just doesn't make
any sense.
You won't find very many dialogs between me and Judy if you do a search
- it's been at least ten years since I had a conversation with her about
anything. But, you can find hundreds, if not thousands of remarks she
has posted calling me a liar and a troll.
Which apparently prompted you to ask: What is she talking about like
that with Richard? Nobody really knows anymore, or cares, but it's my
thread so maybe I will continue this and post my opinions of Judy for a
few years.
But, it is really taking away from my time composing messages about
spiritual paths, music, and what I've been doing. What is really sad
though, is that her constant ankle-biting is causing other respondents
to quit this group and go elsewhere, and maybe that's her goal. In the
case of me and Barry, it just didn't work and that really seems to upset
her.
She's like a schoolyard bully that won't stop until she is expelled from
school, and then she will enroll in another school and start bullying
those poor kids. She followed me over here from Google Groups and has
been harassing me for at least ten years here. Go figure.
P.S. I'm not sure why Emily is in this conversation, she seems like a
nice person most of the time. And Ann is not too bad either, if she
could just get over her prejudice against country folk who just want to
dance at the party and have fun. I mean, if you don't want to dance, why
did they even come to the dance party in the first place?
On 12/16/2013 7:01 AM, Share Long wrote:
Richard and Emily, I think of Caveat as meaning warning as in Caveat
Emptor so that's what I thought when I read Doc's post. That's what I
wondered about, wondering what warning Xeno had written! I guess it
can also mean exception. But honestly, what a tempest in a teapot!
On Monday, December 16, 2013 6:53 AM, Richard J. Williams
<pundits...@gmail.com> wrote:
You are attempting to mislead - this thread is about Professor Post -
that's me. For some reason Bill felt the need to post a derogatory
statement about me, probably because he is JELLOS, which is a very
infantile thing to do. Your attempt to pull Share and Barry into this
is deceptive thread proves you can't or won't post anything specific
about my messages posted here.
Why don't you just start new thread entitled "Caveat to Xeno - why I
won't engage in a dialog"? Or, "I think Share is stupid" or something
like that? It's your right to post your opinion. It is wrong for you
to attempt to bully anyone into defending themselves. You are
perpetuating a disruption to the whole group and I for one am sick of
your constant belittling of the other members of the group. I think
it's time for you to leave. That's what I think.
On 12/15/2013 9:39 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com
<mailto:authfri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Really? And you never connected it with what you've been reading in
the Professor Post thread all along, and many other threads, as well
as what went on in my exchanges with Xeno? Sorry, but I have a very
hard time believing that. You don't usually miss a trick when you
read something you think you can use to your advantage.
Share claimed:
<< Richard, I first saw the phrase Xeno Caveat in a post of Doc's
today. >>
I saw Judy's reply to that. I asked what is a Xeno Caveat. I still
have no idea what is meant by that phrase. I very much enjoy Xeno's
writing. The content is sometimes beyond my experience, but I find
the style of his writing very soothing to my brain. And his sense of
humor is often like a fun surprise when you turn a corner.
On Sunday, December 15, 2013 8:10 PM, Richard J. Williams
<punditster@...> <mailto:punditster@...> wrote:
Judy has been very insulting to Share, almost to the point of
harassment, FOR NO APPARENT REASON, that I can tell. So, I will give
Share credit for sticking around here in the face of personal abuse.
The same goes for Barry too; he's taken an enormous amount of abuse
from Judy. I think in the case of Barry, it's some kind of internet
record for duration in the face of almost constant ankle-biting. Go
figure.
On 12/15/2013 5:25 PM, authfriend@... <mailto:authfriend@...> wrote:
If I'm wrong about what she's up to, I won't say a word. I strongly
suspect you've got it backwards, though.
Feste seethes:
<< Yes, auth, I'm watching. And what I am seeing is a very petty
individual trying to create an argument out of nothing, just so she
can hurl more insults at Share. You really are a nasty piece of
work, there's no doubt about it. >>
