Share, you might like this:
 The Causal body - originally Karana-Sarira - is a Yogic and Vedantic concept 
that was adopted and modified by Theosophy and from the latter made its way 
into the general New Age movement and contemporary western esotericism. It 
generally refers to the highest or innermost subtle body that veils the true 
soul. -Wiki
 

 It is also where strong thought energetic forms can reside that may lift out 
and go forward embedded with the light body of the soul as like a bundle from 
this life carrying a mark in the works. I like Wgm's description here of 
interpenetrating energetic form to describe the flow of the energy bodies. That 
is useful and very good as a way of looking at it. Activated in the human form 
they drape as flowing fabric like fields. In life we use it all and might give 
dents to the fields that can interrupt things in life and beyond too. And then 
it is in the realm of spiritual practice as works in life here that pat things 
down and smooth out the frays. Hopefully we haven't torn things up too much in 
our life-times and weighted down things with too many knots in the fabric of 
the subtle systems and we are settled and straightened out before leaving this 
life. A life well lived. 
 
 -Buck in the Dome     
 

---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, <sharelong60@...> wrote:

 One healer who visits FF twice a year says he's never seen so many top heavy 
causal bodies as he sees here. Lots of spiritual refinement, but ungrounded!
 

 
 
 On Tuesday, December 17, 2013 1:28 PM, wgm4u <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
   The subtler you get the more tenuous forms become until they become arupa, 
or formless consciousness and light. The cut off is the mid-causal above which 
all things are formless, expanded, consciousness and light. There is no need 
for forms at those higher levels.
  
 Most people's causal bodies are very undeveloped but are apparently a glorious 
thing to see in an enlightened soul. All the bodies interpenetrate from the 
physical within which we have the etheric or pranic body, within that is the 
astral and within that is the causal body, beyond these bodies, all 'bodies' 
are shared in common one is fast merging towards the Buddhic or unity of all 
things. However one can still incarnate at any of the lower planes at will, 
like Jesus Christ demonstrated.
  
 That's why MMY calls the Devas (shining ones) creative intelligences of nature.
 

---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, <sharelong60@...> wrote:

 Thanks, wgm. How is the causal body different from the astral body?
 

 
 
 On Tuesday, December 17, 2013 10:28 AM, wgm4u <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
   Yes, absolutely, the astral aura and world is supposedly full of color, your 
aura can be a beautiful pink (love), yellow (intelligence) and even purple or 
violet (devotion), OR it can be a hideous mixture of browns (greed/lust), greys 
(depression) and black (hate, evil), depending.
 

---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, <sharelong60@...> wrote:

 wgm, one site I visited equated Kama rupa with the astral body. Does that jive 
with what you know?
 

 
 
 On Monday, December 16, 2013 6:46 PM, wgm4u <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
   Kama=Desire,  Rupa=form; i.e. the form of desire or the desire body! Usually 
referred to in the after death state where the unfulfilled desires are left in 
what the Catholics call 'purgatory'. This kama-rupa (as opposed to arupa or 
formless) is the suppository of all your worldly desires, if evil it takes on a 
hideous form and is attracted to hellish conditions, if good the outcome is 
happiness, even heaven or what the theosophists call Devachan.
  
 Noted often in Theosophy and Vedic literature.
  
 http://www.katinkahesselink.net/devachan.htm 
http://www.katinkahesselink.net/devachan.htm
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote:

 Richard, what do you mean by Kama-rupa?
 

 
 
 On Sunday, December 15, 2013 8:30 PM, Richard J. Williams <punditster@...> 
wrote:
 
   
 Apparently all the TM mantras are feminine aspect mantras. There is no Shiva 
without Shakti. MMY fully supports the yantra as a golden dome, as pure vastu - 
an enclosure to realize pure consciousness; vastu is almost pure Shakti 
symbolism, and represents the universal womb. MMY is a proponent of yantra and 
Indian vastu and that's why the golden dome has an east-facing entrance with a 
nice fence around it - east is the traditional location of Kama-rupa. They 
don't call it "Mother" India for nothing.
 
 A 'yantra' can be any image, two-dimensional or three-dimensional. Yantras are 
tools for facilitating yogic enstasis, that is, a meditation that is 
transcendental. In tantric yoga, there are mental techniques and tools, such as 
mantra and yantra, asana, puja, etc., used as aids to meditation. A yantra is 
any design that symbolizes a void with the bindu at the center. Shakti is in 
fact, listed as a progenitor in the Guru Dev puja, right after Naryana.
 
 "Shaktism's focus on the Divine Feminine does not imply a rejection of 
Masculine or Neuter divinity. However, both are deemed to be inactive in the 
absence of Shakti. As set out in the first line of Adi Shankara's renowned 
Shakta hymn, Saundaryalahari (c. 800 CE)..."
 
 Read more:
 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaktism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaktism
 
 On 12/15/2013 6:38 PM, yifuxero@... mailto:yifuxero@... wrote:
 
   Interesting, but MMY discarded this aspect of Devi worship; thus not 
following in the footsteps of Guru Dev. I've not encountered any instances of 
MMY promoting Devi worship, Sri Yantra or Sri Chakra pujas, or for that matter, 
the knowledge of Tantric symbols, or any related practices, aside silent 
repetition of the mantras.  No japa or worship of the Sri Yantra, or the 
Lalitasahasranama. .
 ...
 OTOH, Ramana Maharshi - even though regarded as a "pure Advaitin", had regular 
daily Sri Chakra pujas conducted at his Ashram.  So go figure....MMY is a 
Sabateur.....effectively putting an end to Devi worship in that particular 
lineage.
 ...
 
 
 ...
 
 
 
 
 

 
 




 
 
 
 




 
 

 




 
 
 
 




 
 

 
 




 
 
 
 





 
 

 
 




 
 
 
 




Reply via email to