So everybody should be a construction worker? You seem to be stuck in the middle ages.

On 01/07/2014 08:46 AM, Mike Dixon wrote:
Profit off of others? Absolutely! I think if somebody wants to invest in a business, risk their capital and reputation and hire people to work for them so that they can make a profit, that's great! Nobody makes you work for some one else. If you don't like your job, quit! If you're so special, someone will be willing to hire you for what you're worth. But maybe you're not worth what you think you are. Market forces determine that.
*From:* Bhairitu <>
*Sent:* Sunday, January 5, 2014 12:56 PM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Let's talk about the big gorilla in the room It was ridiculous because you knew the answer to begin with. Asking it made you look "stoopid." Besides my statement was facetious so like someone said the other day you seem to be irony challenged. I would expect you to be better than that.There is no difference between the bourgeoisie and capitalist elite. Bourgeoisie is just an antiquated term for the same thing. But I do think Marx rather lamely defined it too since it would have indicted artists and musicians too. He should have just stuck to those who profit off the labors of others which apparently Mike believes is OK.On 01/05/2014 09:39 AM, <> wrote:
*Why was it ridiculous, Tovarich?*

*And what's the difference between the bourgeoisie and the ruling capitalist elite?*

<< Comrade Mike, you mean the bourgeoisie. Comrade Judy's question was ridiculous anyway. >>

    On 01/05/2014 07:07 AM, Mike Dixon wrote:

The *ruling capitolist elite* of course! You know, the *banksters* and Illuminati, Mwahahahahahahahaaha.

*From:* mailto:authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@...
*To:* <>
*Sent:* Saturday, January 4, 2014 11:48 AM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Let's talk about the big gorilla in the room
"They" who?

<< Football is probably the closest thing they could come to gladiators killing each other to satisfy the masses with bread and circuses. it's a national distraction. >>

Reply via email to