So bring it up with Bevan and see how receptive his is on the idea.
--------------------------------------------
On Sat, 1/11/14, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:

 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: All About the Fighting Ascetics of India
 To: [email protected]
 Date: Saturday, January 11, 2014, 11:43 AM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
   
 
 
     
       
       
       Really,
 Maharishi's meditators should be at the next
 Shankaracharya
 peace-conference between all these upstarts and contenders
 to bring
 some bonafide spiritual coherence to things there.  The
 whole thing
 is a joke if we are not
 included.
 -Buck
 of the Dome 
 
 
 ---In [email protected], <punditster@...>
 wrote:
 
 On 1/10/2014 6:22
 PM, Michael Jackson wrote:
 
 
 
   > if the will
 wasn't contested, where the hell do you
 
  > think the other contenders came from?
 
  >
 
  The SBS will wasn't contested in a
 court of law. Swami Vasudevananda 
 
 Saraswati is currently the *sole representative Guru
 Dev's lineage*, 
 
 according to Sundaresan. In the case of the Shakaracharya it
 is the 
 
 usual custom to follow the disciplic succession: 
 "...once Swami 
 
 Brahmananda Saraswati was accepted as the Jyotirmath
 Sankaracharya, and 
 
 there were no serious disputes about it at the time, further
 activities 
 
 of these other institutions with respect to succession
 issues could be 
 
 construed as unnecessary interference."
 
 
 
 Work cited:
 
 
 
 Jyotirmath Sankaracharya Lineage in the 20th Century
 
 by Vidyasankar Sundaresan
 
 http://indology.info/papers/sundaresan/
 
 
 
 PASSED ON: Senior, retired, Shankaracharya of Jyotir Peeth,
 Swami 
 
 Shantanand
 
 Saraswati Ji Maharaj, age ninety, on December 7, 1997, in
 Allahabad, India.
 
 Senior leaders of the VHP participated in final rites. Swami
 became
 
 Shankaracharya in 1953 after the death of his guru,
 Brahmanand Saraswati.
 
 Swami Vasudevanand Saraswati is his successor...
 
 
 
 Hinduism Today March 1998
 
     
      
 
     
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Reply via email to