If I have to become like Stern or Brand to be wealthy, I am happy to remain a 
man of modest means
--------------------------------------------
On Wed, 1/22/14, Richard Williams <pundits...@gmail.com> wrote:

 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Russel Brand on Sex with 2 girls with rubber, 
the lovely mother of Kathy Perry and Transcendental Meditation
 To: "Richard J. Williams" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 Date: Wednesday, January 22, 2014, 5:36 PM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
   
 
 
     
       
       
       MJ:> I do know a
 complete ass when I see and hear
 one>Well, fer sure Russell Brand
 getting Katy Perry or Howard Stern getting a million dollars
 for a radio show can't begin to compare to any of your
 accomplishments! LoL!
 
 
 On Wed, Jan 22, 2014
 at 10:41 AM, Michael Jackson <mjackso...@yahoo.com>
 wrote:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
   
 
 
     
       
       
       I don't pretend to know a damn thing about all
 the esoteric ancient Indian mumbo jumbo which as I said in a
 previous post I believe to be the legacy of a bunch of guys
 who hung out in the forests and jungles cuz they didn't
 want to do any real work, had a lot of wild things happen
 with their eyes closed and told everyone who came to see
 them - "See, this! What I experience is real reality,
 not that carp y'all are doin' out there, so that
 proves Y'ALL are the ones who are screwd up, not
 me!"
 
 
 
 
 But I do know a complete ass when I see and hear one, and
 Brand certainly fits that bill. But he like David Lynch are
 PERFECT spokespersons for the TMO - as in do what I say,
 believe what I say, not what I do.
 
 --------------------------------------------
 
 On Wed, 1/22/14, Richard Williams <pundits...@gmail.com>
 wrote:
 
 
 
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Russel Brand on Sex with 2
 girls with rubber, the lovely mother of Kathy Perry and
 Transcendental Meditation
 
  To: "Richard J. Williams" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 
  Date: Wednesday, January 22, 2014, 3:47 PM
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
    
 
  
 
  
 
      
 
        
 
        
 
        Well, I figure MJ was mostly
 
  interested in the first part. It's so refreshing to
 read
 
  a post by a common guy like MJ on obscure sex acts and not
 
  commenting on some pseudo-scholarly report about
 
  Shankara's Advaita Vedanta and the meaning of the term
 
  maya. LoL!
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  On Wed, Jan 22, 2014
 
  at 7:30 AM, nablusoss1008 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>
 
  wrote:
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
    
 
  
 
  
 
      
 
        
 
        
 
        "well
 
  since the rest of it was all about what a wowie zowie guy
 he
 
  is with women" 
 
  No it wasn't. Which shows that you
 
  didn't even bother to listen to the interview you
 
  commented on.
 
  
 
  Like the Americans say: "Go
 
  figure"
 
  
 
      
 
       
 
  
 
      
 
      
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
    
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
      
 
       
 
  
 
      
 
      
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
    
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
     
      
 
     
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
      
 
     
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Reply via email to