As I've already told you, Share, it really doesn't help just to repeat your 
misunderstanding over and over. You have never bothered to engage with what Ann 
and I have told you.

 I'll try it one more time: Enlightenment reached by Eastern systems is, 
according to Robin, the real, genuine state of enlightenment.

 Got that?

 But genuine enlightenment itself is not what it's cracked up to be: It imposes 
a delusionary experience of oneself, of the world, and of one's relationship to 

 Now, read those two sentences over and over until it dawns on you where your 
misunderstanding lies.

 I'm not interested in hearing from you again on this until you can show you 
understand Robin's position correctly (whether you agree with it or not).
 << Judy, here is what I understand: you used the phrases enlightened days and 
genuine enlightenment with regards to Robin. Then you said that Robin said that 
enlightenment reached via Eastern systems is a delusion because ontological 
union between God and human is not possible.

Are these statements accurate? >>

 On Monday, February 10, 2014 11:25 PM, "authfriend@..." <authfriend@...> wrote:
   You're repeating his (or my or Ann's) words out of context and without 
understanding, Share. You're not really trying to understand; you just want to 
find a way to bash him.

 << Judy, later Robin said that his state of enlightenment was actually, to use 
Ann's words, a state of delusion. I'm merely repeating what he himself has 
said. Or what you and Ann have said that he said. >>
 On Monday, February 10, 2014 5:45 PM, "authfriend@..." <authfriend@...> wrote:
   Of course you denigrated Robin. Robin claimed he had been enlightened, and 
you're insisting he wasn't.

 I've explained why your "logic" is, to say the least, faulty several times, as 
has Ann. It really doesn't help your case that you keep repeating your 
misunderstanding without ever addressing what we've been telling you.

 << Judy, I did not denigrate Robin. I called your phrases enlightened days and 
genuine enlightenment inaccurate because you said that Robin said that 
enlightenment, including his, via Eastern systems is a delusion because 
ontological union between God and human is not possible. >>

 Xeno doesn't read the posts he counts here. If he did, he'd realize that most 
of Barry's posts were thoroughly dishonest attacks on me or Robin; and that in 
addition to refuting Barry's dishonesty, a substantial number of my posts were 
dealing with a discussion our Stevie can't seem to let go of in which he is 
quite idiotically trying to insist Robin and I were deliberately trying to 
"fool" people with our irony exchange; plus a bunch from Share attempting to 
denigrate Robin via her misunderstanding of his views on enlightenment.

 (Although the two posts he claims had the same title, did not.)

 << Posts from 1 February 2014 to 10 February 2014 4:00pm EST  

143 replies, 4 original posts (although 2 had the same title)

 53 replies, 16 original posts >>






Reply via email to