Huh? What are you responding to in my post? I can't make the connection. I 
didn't say anything about how the women Maharishi played around with felt. 

 << what do you think Marsh's gals felt when he used 'em - bliss? I know some 
did. at least Judith Borque says she was happy and all that - but all of 
them??? >> --------------------------------------------
 On Sat, 2/15/14, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... <authfriend@... 
mailto:authfriend@...> wrote:
 
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: John M. Knapp: Licensing Board Ruling
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Saturday, February 15, 2014, 9:14 PM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 OK. I'm not
 aware of any stories of sexual hanky-panky with Knapp,
 actually. I don't believe that was the problem Carol had
 with him. As I understand it, hers was more a matter of
 genuine psychological rape (as opposed to the kind Share
 fantasized from Robin).
 << I read
 plenty of his stuff and followed his troubles when patients
 began to complain - I watched him blame everyone but himself
 and he certainly did use Marshy's playbook in some
 respects to get his hands on women. >>
 --------------------------------------------
 On Sat, 2/15/14, authfriend@... <authfriend@...>
 wrote:
 
 
 
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: John M. Knapp: Licensing
 Board Ruling
 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 
 Date: Saturday, February 15, 2014, 7:15 PM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 You didn't know Knapp. He followed his own
 
 twisted footsteps.
 
 << not
 
 surprising that he would eventually follow in his form
 
 master's foot steps - there are others who have like
 Bob
 
 Fickes >>
 
 --------------------------------------------
 
 On Sat, 2/15/14, j_alexander_stanley@...
 
 <j_alexander_stanley@...>
 
 wrote:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: John M. Knapp: Licensing Board
 
 Ruling
 
 
 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 
 
 
 Date: Saturday, February 15, 2014, 5:48 PM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Interesting... when you posted earlier this
 
 
 
 morning, I Googled around to refresh my memory, and the one
 
 
 
 thing that really stood out for me was the "defrocked
 
 
 
 therapist" self-description he uses to promote
 
 himself.
 
 
 
 I thought it very odd that a person would accentuate the
 
 
 
 consequences of his malevolence as some kind of badge of
 
 
 
 honor. Strange guy, that one.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 
 
 
 <jchwelch@...> wrote:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Thanks for the
 
 
 
 kind words Anne. Of
 
 
 
 course, there is a lot that happened between the lines of
 
 
 
 the brief outline.IMO (and others who were
 
 
 
 involved), Knapp's revocation is a good thing; he has
 
 
 
 harmed more than one person, including at least three
 
 
 
 ex-clients. From Knapp's online public
 
 
 
 displays, he has claimed he lost his license over at least
 
 a
 
 
 
 year ago (and that due to a lawsuit), though that isn't
 
 
 
 the case because the ruling wasn't made until January,
 
 
 
 2014, and there was never a lawsuit. Regardless, Knapp
 
 seems
 
 
 
 to wear a lost license (or as he publicly describes himself
 
 
 
 as a "defrocked therapist") as a badge of being a
 
 
 
 rebel, or something. At least now, there is a public
 
 
 
 official ruling which will make it difficult for him to get
 
 
 
 licensed again if he ever would have an interest in doing
 
 
 
 so.Thanks again. Hope you and the horses are
 
 
 
 well. :-) 


Reply via email to