Nabby, it actually is a link says 'show message history' in the reply window 
which you now seem to have found. I missed it for a while. But occasionally I 
will enter a thread not replying to a particular post, and then either delete 
the previous message(s) or do not show message history. But if you are 
responding to a specific post, it really helps clarify the thread because Neo 
does not sort out the sub-discussions that take place within a thread as the 
old interface used to. All the Yahoo servers I have access to now have the Neo 
interface, so I no longer can access the old interface, which had remained on 
servers Yahoo uses for e-mail for AT&T in the U.S. 

 I do not have time to stay on FFL continuously, and even after a day a 
discussion veers off so far it becomes hard to follow. I am unable to read all 
posts, but I do not segregate posters into 'good' and 'bad' piles and not read 
them because they disagree with me. Most people here ignore me anyway. I read 
your posts. I disagree with many of them. I think there are many faults with 
the way the TMO functions, and that much of what it provides is off track for 
enlightenment. 
 

 Still I found the TM techniques I have received functional for the most part 
and they were a great aid in clarifying my experience, and were the primary 
ones I used for most of the time I have meditated. My thoughts on these 
techniques is actually much more positive now than it was ten years ago; 
others' seem to have the opposite experience. I think there is a distinction 
between people who succeed with TM and those who do not and it might be this: 
If a person's reason for starting TM is for enlightenment and no other purpose, 
and that is the overriding drive for his/her practice, than I think the person 
has a good chance. If a person is involved simply for the experience of 
community, for intellectual understandings, or because you think in spite of 
denials it really is a 'true' religion, or you just want a 'better' life, I 
think failure is a definite and probable possibility. And I would say this 
applies to any so-called path of enlightenment, Buddhist, Christian, Sufi, 
Taoist, etc., that focus on the main purpose of these experiential tracks is 
essential for success, otherwise there is a lack of focus in why one is doing 
it. For example, waiting for a Messiah to save you and bring about heaven on 
Earth is probably not a good way to approach enlightenment because you are 
off-loading focus to someone else.
 

 There are people on FFL that are going to annoy you; they are not likely all 
the same ones that annoy me. We each have a set of preferences. No doubt I have 
annoyed you many times.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote :

 OK, did I get it right now ? Anyways, what makes you think I even read the 
post from MJ and Sal ? I do sometimes read your though but haven't even seen 
the "see all messages" thing, I'm not here often enough to have even noticed it.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote :

 I don't believe anybody said it was "so difficult." It's just a nuisance. And 
the point is that you could eliminate that nuisance with a single mouse click, 
as Salyavin, Michael, and I have asked you to. There's no reason for you not to 
do it except to be deliberately discourteous. 

 This may come as a shock to you, but it's not necessarily the case that 
everyone is so utterly fascinated by your conversations that the "flow" will 
stick in their minds. 

 (Don't pay any attention to Richard, for pete's sake. He's just trolling, as 
usual.)
 

 

 I also wondered why it was so difficult for some to follow the flow. Go figure 
:-)
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <punditster@...> wrote :

 On 3/9/2014 7:49 AM, salyavin808 wrote:
 > I'd say please press the "show message history" before posting so we 
 > can see what you are on about
 >
 There are only about six or seven us having an online conversation these 
 days - I can remember what each one you has posted the day before. I 
 don't need no "message history" because I keep up with the 
 conversations. I don't need to go back and re-read what anyone wrote 
 last week or last year. By this time, we already know how everyone feels 
 in general about things. So, click the three buttons if you want to - 
 I'm using Thunderbird and I don't miss a thing. Or, just keep up with 
 the conversation and the flow. If you don't want to dance, why did you 
 even come to the dance party? That's what I think.










Reply via email to