Thanks for replying - yeah, it is hard to tell if those entrenched, "we are 
simply better than you" attitudes will change, but happy to see the dirty 
laundry flapping out the window for a change.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mjackson74@...> wrote :

 Actually, I think you are right in everything you said. And as odd as it may 
seem to some here, I am willing to believe that folks doing things in their 
awareness can work seeming miracles. If Anita Moorjani can eliminate her many 
tumors in 11 days after coming out of a coma, then most anything is possible.
 
 I don't really think the yagya deal is any more efficacious than a group of 
Christians getting together for regular prayer and it seems clear the TMO uses 
the idea that the pundits yagyas are something real special to collect large 
fees - which I think is not too cool. I mean, they raise a hundred thousand 
bucks to save England when the pundits are already on site and could easily do 
it anyway with no need for donations?
 
 Anyhow, I agree its good for the Movement that this happened, but perhaps you 
are more optimistic than I am as to the end result. Having seen Bevan and some 
of his lieutenants in action in years past (like Chris Crowell - ugh!) I think 
they will dig their heels in and do as they always do which was generally 
change nothing and denounce anyone who asks for change as being "negative" or 
get rid of 'em.
 --------------------------------------------
 On Fri, 3/21/14, doctordumbass@... mailto:doctordumbass@... <doctordumbass@... 
mailto:doctordumbass@...> wrote:
 
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Question for Feste
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Friday, March 21, 2014, 12:20 PM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Hey, MJ, good morning, and allow
 me to sashay right into the middle of this - 
 I think this whole "pundit riot" (PR for short),
 which was *very tame* by international standards, was a good
 thing. 
 It woke up the administration, like nothing else would have,
 and publicized the program - as the phrase goes, 'there
 is no such thing as bad publicity'. 
 After this, the full spotlight is on the dudes in Iowa, in
 their cream colored suits. Nothing like a little unwelcome
 attention, from the general public, and surrounding
 communities, to get something right.:-) 
 Your thoughts?
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
<mjackson74@...>
 wrote :
 
 Feste, if I
 recall correctly, you said the pundit program should be
 ended and that it was a mistake to begin with. Why do you
 feel it was a mistake from the beginning?
 
 
 
 MJ 

Reply via email to