Apparently, paper bags take up more space in a landfill. Go figure.

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 3:25 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> A few months ago, I found out that Daly City, CA has joined SF's ban on
> plastic bags.  San Antonio and other cities in the country might follow
> soon.
>
>
> ---In [email protected], <noozguru@...> wrote :
>
> The plastic grocery bags are supposed to be recyclable.  I often take a
> bunch of them to Nob Hill where they have a box to put them.  I think they
> are partially paper anyway.  SF has a bunch of vary anal people who tend to
> Stalinist in their politics.
>
> I always forget I have a canvas Trader Joes bag in the car when I go to
> other stores.  And I think a lot of people forget they can recycle the
> plastic bags so they pile up in the garage.  Or worse yet they throw them
> in the garbage.  But we still have a lot of packaging including styrofoam
> padding that goes in the garbage or the newspaper covers (like SF Chron
> uses) which aren't recyclable.
>
> On 03/31/2014 12:17 PM, jr_esq@... wrote:
>
>
>
> Believe it or not, most of the people here in SF have accepted the ban on
> plastic bags.  I personally am not bothered by it.  Now, I'm using a
> canvass bag, which I've received by joining some environmental groups, to
> haul my groceries.  Also, the grocery stores charge customers 10 cents for
> paper bags that they provide.  This was made legal by the city of SF.
>
> I feel like I'm doing my part for conservation and being eco-friendly.
>
>
> ---In [email protected], <punditster@...> <punditster@...>wrote :
>
> "In San Francisco, the cost of a residential trash can rose from $19.08 in
> 2005 before its plastic bag ban to $34.08 in 2013, a 78.6 percent increase
> out of step with San Francisco's 5 percent population growth and 19.5
> percent inflation during that period."
>
> What's up with that?
>
> 'Banning plastic bags a bad, maybe deadly, idea'
> http://www.mysanantonio.com/opinion//<http://www.mysanantonio.com/opinion/commentary/article/Banning-plastic-bags-a-bad-maybe-deadly-idea-5358177.php>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 6:24 AM, <j_alexander_stanley@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> My advice: live in tune with all The Laws of Nature and go to bed before
> 10, as Vedic Jesus commands. That way, late night TV will cease to exist,
> as you ponder the back of your eyelids.
>
>
> ---In [email protected], <punditster@...> wrote :
>
>
> On 3/21/2014 9:34 PM, j_alexander_stanley@... wrote:
>
> > Error log says Gmail horked up a hairball when the script tried to
> > send the post count a couple hours ago. I just ran it manually for
> > your post counting convenience.
> >
>
> Thanks, Alex, for running the Post Count,now I can get some rest.
>
> While I've got your attention, it seems like every time I tune in my TV
> around this time at night, there are what, four different talk shows on
> at the same time. You got your Jimmy Kimmel, your got your Jimmy Fallon,
> you got your David Letterman, and you got your Arsenio Hall. If you stay
> up late enough, you get your Craig Ferguson and only God knows what talk
> show after that.
>
> Is there no end to these talk shows? Is it just me, or do these guys all
> have the same guests on, all talking about the same thing, just rotating
> around the studio. Now, here's Jimmy Kimmel with Ricky Gervis. Now will
> someone please tell me what has Ricky Gervis ever done that I should
> remember anything he has to say?
>
> What's up with that?
>
>
>
>  
>

Reply via email to