tell me, because I really don't know, but is it a fallacy when one cites examples from a ridiculous extreme to try to make their points? I mean, sure, we all like to hear outrageous stories, but when that's the main content of what one's posts, it does get a little predictable. Just sayin', as they say
---In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote : Invisibility would be fun, I heard they dropped it from the course because people were learning just to become invisible. Doesn't sound very likely, levitation would just as impressive, how about both at the same time? Difficult to prove though. LOL! Maybe they kept the flying sutra in because it's easier to convince people that hopping might one day become floating, than being able to be seen might one day become invisibility. I do know someone who learned the invisibility sutra and someone told him his legs disappeared when he was meditating. Honest. The power of suggestion! ---In [email protected], <mjackson74@...> wrote : I always regretted I didn't get the invisibility sutra nor the understanding the language of animals - they weren't handing those out to us plebeian meditators otherwise known as Rising Sidhas, dunno why - I guess they thought the more highly evolved governors had unstressed their asses off too much when trying to turn invisible and maybe a few of 'em got carted off to mental institutions when their families found them talking to squirrels and such and believing they answered back after the new gov's got back home from the much vaunted 6 month courses. --------------------------------------------
