I agree with the fist part, but seeing someone farther gone than Nappy kind-a 
makes me bilious. 
--------------------------------------------
On Mon, 4/21/14, TurquoiseBee <[email protected]> wrote:

 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi mentioned in more than one text over 
thousand years old
 To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
 Date: Monday, April 21, 2014, 6:34 PM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
   
 
 
     
       
       
       From: Michael Jackson
 <[email protected]>
  To:
 [email protected] 
  Sent: Monday,
 April 21, 2014 8:20 PM
  Subject: Re:
 [FairfieldLife] Maharishi mentioned in more than one text
 over thousand years old
    
 
  
 
 
 
   
 
 
     
       
       
       If by saying "also mentioned" you are
 referring to the ridiculous and false assertion that Marshy
 was spoken of in the Linga Purana, look for yourself - it
 isn't in there. That assertion and yours regarding the
 Nadi text is wild fantasy.
 It's also wildly self-important cult fantasy,
 based on the fallacious concept, "I am important,
 because I once got to hang with someone important."
 Once people have bought into this concept, and learned to
 base their entire self-worth on their spiritual teacher,
 they'll believe ANYTHING that makes him seem more
 important, because in their minds that makes *them* more
 important. 
 
 On the other hand, it's refreshing to meet
 someone who is even more lost in this fantasy than
 Nabby. :-)
 
 
 --------------------------------------------
 
 On Mon, 4/21/14, [email protected] <[email protected]>
 wrote:
 
 
 
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Maharishi mentioned in more than
 one text over thousand years old
 
  To: [email protected]
 
  Date: Monday, April 21, 2014, 4:52 P
 
        
 
        Maharshi was also mentioned and his role in the
 
  Nadi text of Maharishi Shuka Deva! This according to the
 
  traditional guardians of the text who were not in any
 way
 
  affiliated with him and even said to have expressed some
 
  shock/horror at relating this news presumably due to
 what
 
  they regarded as his non-brahmin status!
 
   Certain persons who do not even read sanskrit,may
 or
 
  may not have read a modified/ abridged/english
 version 
 
  and have shown their bias are not of much real interest
 
  here.
 
  I am more interested in what did Maharishi know of these
 
  prophesies and when did he learn them? I would like to
 hear
 
  from anyone who knows this, its more along the lines of
 what
 
  the prophet lady says in the first Matrix film about what
 is
 
  really going mess with your head!
 
  
 
      
 
       
 
  
 
      
 
      
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
    
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
     
      
 
     
     
 
 
 
 
     
 
     
      
 
     
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Reply via email to