One can't argue with deluded people. When Curtis claims knowledge is not structured in consciousness he wants us to believe that he is the same when tired, in deep sleep, after a couple of drinks, when playing "music" and in meditation. Right. If anyone doubted Curtis was delusional/and or a liar all they have to is read that post. A phony and more than "a little fake" as his friend the Turq.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <fleetwood_macncheese@...> wrote : LOL - good one! He is such a phony - The only reason Barry continuously brings up the level setting, is for fear his lack of progress, in any domain of his life, will be made obvious. What a little fake. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <awoelflebater@...> wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <turquoiseb@...> wrote : On Sunday, May 18, 2014 6:33 AM, "dhamiltony2k5@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> wrote: In range and distribution of illumined Batgap interviewees by types, just throwing these Batgap illumined people interviewed thus far on a scatter graph by their experience and spiritual affect on others, it seems observable that some of the awakened are more proactive in affect as teachers, some are long time practiced at helping others spiritually and/or transformational for others just by being of a field effect of presence. Some of them are teachers in nature of character, while some may glow in the closet and watch sort of like Harri by experience was for so long. Others transformational in effect like a Janet Sussman also from childhood or Connie Huebner from younger or Ammachi from way back, yet different from glowing in the closet each in their lives have been engaged teaching in formats with spiritual experience, techniques and scholarship to be of help to others for much of their lives, Batgap is a fabulous oral archive around this range of spiritual possibility within humanity based on a scale of abiding experience and spiritual transformational affect. It is useful for parsing to see them in a range and distribution of, Teachers -Gurus -Sat Gurus -Jagad Gurus by scale of transformational affect. Just as a question, wouldn't it be more interesting to consider the possibility that everyone Rick has ever interviewed is Just Another Human Being, whose experiences are in no way any "better" or "higher" than any others? In other words, it seems to me that Buck is still arguing for the elitism approach, trying to categorize these folks into "higher/lower" and "better/worse" pigeonholes so that people like him can look up to some of them and look down on others. Wouldn't it be more...uh, dare I say it...enlightened to consider them all at exactly the same level -- just human beings having an opinion based on their individual interpretations of their respective subjective experiences? Nicely said, now, shall we start with you trying this little experiment with the people you dislike because they find you uninteresting and boorish? Let's see how expansive and all-encompassing your mind can become for this lab test. Let's start with Jim and Judy - first exercise: list all the positive things you are able to appreciate about them and there has to be a minimum of 5 things per person. No sarcasm, only genuine expressed ability to "consider them all at exactly the same level -- just human beings having an opinion based on their individual interpretations of their respective subjective experiences." We'll wait - no doubt forever.
