--- In [email protected], akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Bullshit. > > > > You know and I know and everyone that read it knew that you cited > > Canadians -- and not Armenians or Germans or Peruvians or any of the > > other 150 or so nationalities of the world -- because that is MY > > nationality. > > > > You made it personal, Bub. At least have the integrity to be honest. > > > > And you chose genitals to make your point -- not arms or legs or > > other appendages or organs -- because that is where your mind is. > > > > And you used a derogative term for male genitals -- dick -- because, > > again, that is where your mind is at. > > > > > > This is silly. > > Therapy may help shemp. I mean that seriously, you are so hung up with > your genitals and nationality. > > My point could have been equally made by saying "all males." I threw > in something more selective "canadian immigrants", I could have said > "southwesterners" or "TMOers" or "conservatives" just as well to make > my point. > > The point being, to make you think about what it means for the state > to own your body. How simple do I need to make ponts for you to get them? > > > > > I simply cited a study. It was not pro or anti abortion. It > > indicated > > > the relationship between crime and abortion. That makes me a > > Nazi? > > > > It does in the same sense that my copying and pasting the article on > > Nobel prizes makes ME supportive of the opinions expressed in THAT > > article. > > > > I imposed the same standard you imposed upon me upon you. > > hahahhaa. such logic. > > Levitt was not suggesting policy. Your articles author had clear > racist undertones. Which you have yet to refute. > > > > > Unlike you, I don't judge people by their name and the apparent > > genetic/racial/religious heritage it may suggest but by the content > > of their character. > > > hahahha. You are really getting delusional shemp in making up stuff > about my positions. > > Its one thing to intelligently debate policy. That can be interesting > and informative. Its quite another when you ignore any substance and > simply cast disparaging names and attribute delusional theories to > others and then critique the the delusions. You can do that all by > yourself. Best of luck. May you find fulfillment doing so. >
My advise to you, then, is to simply ignore my posts and not spend so much time, as you do above, responding to me. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
