Richard, There is just one person here who has defended me in every instance in which I have been attacked, or slighted, or insulted, and that is you.
Thank you for that. But, I don't come to your defense, and it certainly doesn't mean I agree with the 40 or 50 attacks pointed in your direction on a daily basis. But you know that. And you know that I have neither the time, money or inclination to counter every barb fired in Share's direction. Wait, did I just say, "money". Oh well. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <punditster@...> wrote : steve.sun...@... [FairfieldLife] Sat, 30 Aug 2014 20:26:18 -0700 > > I own up to being a member of the DE fan club. > > On 8/31/2014 9:31 AM, steve.sundur@... mailto:steve.sundur@... [FairfieldLife] wrote: See Richard, I'm not from Texas, so things are different. > It just seemed strange for you to say you were a "fan of DE" when she picked on Share, for no apparent reason. Where I come from, like most every other place, when someone is silent and their friend gets attacked, that usually indicates that they agree with the attacker. Go figure. > I remember in the third grade, Mrs. McCoy said she had something to tell us. She said, "Class, there is something we need to discuss. People in Texas believe that 'Silence Implies Consent'. But we are from Missouri, and we don't believe that. Have I made myself clear, class?" And we all said, "Yes teacher" So there you have it. > On 8/30/2014 12:38 PM, dmevans365@... mailto:dmevans365@ mailto:dmevans365@... [FairfieldLife] wrote: > Yep. Interesting what has happened. The limits were removed. Almost immediately, Richard and Share ushered the forum into its evolution as a chat room - characterized as all are by a preponderence of meaningless drivel. Gone are the limits telling the brain to put some thought into a post, put some thought into topics, put some thought into with who and in what format one wanted to converse. Limits that forced a pause in the action. Quite the statement this forum is, really. >
